Mayweather vs. Cotto. In July. Who do you think would win?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
-
My point is that you have a bias towards black fighters but you don't want to admit it. You laught at people who thought Oscar won but seem if they think Mosley won is ok. When in both case saying that either of Mosley or Oscar is wrong.Comment
-
When you say razor thin you make it sound as if it could have gone either way. But now you say clear which means that there's no doubt Cotto won. I didn't think it was that close it was a competitive fight and I had it 8-4. I had Floyd 7-5 over Oscar.
My point is that you have a bias towards black fighters but you don't want to admit it. You laught at people who thought Oscar won but seem if they think Mosley won is ok. When in both case saying that either of Mosley or Oscar is wrong.
When I JUST SAID I had Cotto beating Mosley by a CLOSE decision...
If Im so bias towards black fighters.. why not have MOSLEY winning the CLOSE decision?
Intereeeeeeeeesting..Comment
-
Comment
-
It's crazy how I ask a simple question and I get wins from the 1800's.
Idc if Cotto beat Quintana, Judah, Mosley (Yeah right he beat him lol).
I'm talking about now
Gomez, Margarito(L), Jennings
Gomez and Jennings are well-deserved fights?
Okay so 2 well-deserved fights against 2 bums and one loss to a top WW and all of a sudden Cotto is the man to beat?
Mosley is the man to beat right now.
If Cotto wants to be regarded the best, he needs to beat Clottey and then Mosley in a plce not called NY.
And then afterwards, he can get Mayweather's attention.
As of now, Mayweather see's his last 3 fights and would think "Okay? who is Miguel Cotto?"
It's about recent fights, don't bring up **** from Pre World War II.Last edited by Kevin Jesus; 04-22-2009, 12:01 PM.Comment
-
If you thought that I wouldn't be calling you bias, I would be calling you ******.Comment
Comment