sounds reasonable I agree.....
I mean people were already poopooing DLHs fight with Pacquiao at 147. So why all of a sudden is this fight not as big of a mismatch?
Mayweather beat DLH (Mayweather > DLH) Pacquiao has beaten JMM (MP > JMM)
So if its a missmatch when the lesser of the bigger guys fights the greater of the smaller guys, why would it not be a missmatch (on paper) when the lesser of the small guys takes on the greater of the bigger guys?
I know its not that simple, but yeah.
I mean people were already poopooing DLHs fight with Pacquiao at 147. So why all of a sudden is this fight not as big of a mismatch?
Mayweather beat DLH (Mayweather > DLH) Pacquiao has beaten JMM (MP > JMM)
So if its a missmatch when the lesser of the bigger guys fights the greater of the smaller guys, why would it not be a missmatch (on paper) when the lesser of the small guys takes on the greater of the bigger guys?
I know its not that simple, but yeah.
Comment