Here's a theory...
Collapse
-
-
So when Hatton beats Pacquaio will you still hold firm to your statement, you do realize that Hatton and Marquez called Floyd out dont you?SG, Mickey Malone, and QuCongee all did and they responded with proper opinions. Only you and Mr. Crust didn't and I couldn't fathom why because it's all there in black and white.
If you didn't understand what I was saying, why were you so quick to respond about how ****** it was. I think you understood it, but just couldn't agree with it and responded with a childish remark.
Anyway, I don't really want this to be about you and me. If you don't understand it, there are other topics in forum that might suit your liking.Comment
-
Discredit? If you read, if you could actually read, the last paragraph, it was actually a question open for discussion. It's really up to people to answer the question. That's if you can read, first of all.
Top welterweights? So you think he can beat Mosley, Cotto, PWill or a Berto? Again, a question?Comment
-
What statement? It's a theory, which has to be proven first and it was never a statement, it was a question which you are free to answer with your own opinion.
When Hatton beats Pacquiao then this should answer my question. Right now all I have are questions, which you don't seem to want to answer. Answer the question?Comment
-
Hatton is regraded as one of the P4P best fighters on the planet. He's an elite fighter and he's also the biggest draw in boxing, now that Oscar has walked. Put all them things together and tell me he didn't deserve to be in the ring with Floyd?
You can say what you want about Hatton's ability, but if you're smart enough to get fights with the likes of Pacquiao and Mayweather and have a que of other big names like Mosley, Cotto, Oscar(before he retired), JMM and others, then who's the mug? Not Hatton.Comment
-
Comment
-
See that where it all went wrong, because you "assumed". You do realize that when someone says "assumed", they were the one who usually made the mistake. It's an acceptance of fault.
It's not a Hatton is **** spam. It's a question I am asking which you have the right to answer. But you just want to attack my post instead of answering the question.
I don't like Darchinyan, but his recent successes, beating Mijares, Kirilov, Arce and unifying the titles are worthy of mention and have surely moved him into the P4P rankings. I'm sure it's a safe bet that he is more highly ranked that Hatton nowadays, thus the inclusion in my statement.Comment
-
Well it sounded silly bringing up Darchinyan, you realize what weight he fights at?What statement? It's a theory, which has to be proven first and it was never a statement, it was a question which you are free to answer with your own opinion.
When Hatton beats Pacquiao then this should answer my question. Right now all I have are questions, which you don't seem to want to answer. Answer the question?Comment
-
It probably did, but I wasn't insinuating that they will be fighting. It was more of naming the P4P entrants and Darchinyan being in the bottom of my list, a little bit ahead of Hatton in my opinion, I said "even Darchinyan".
It was more of a reference to the current top fighters, regardless of the division. Does Hatton belong here or was he a hype job, created indirectly by PBF?Comment
Comment