Rate Pacman's Resume

[-Blackout-]

Rate it................................................

[cuzfozzy]

he's a throwback to the hagler hearns era ..
not as great as mayweather YET

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

From 1-10 Ill say a 7, mayweathers being 5 and DHLs 10!!!!!!!!

[hammerhiem]

Very good, only bettered by Bhop in the modern era.

[Jayseen]

I rate it 8.4/10

[MANGLER]

Very good.

[Fighting Champ]

he's a throwback to the hagler hearns era ..
not as great as mayweather YET

He only has a way better resume then Mayweather for beating the top opponnets at the time at their best weight class.

[cuzfozzy]

He only has a way better resume then Mayweather for beating the top opponnets at the time at their best weight class.

Pac is like some guy outta a time machine
he could have been around in the hagler/hearns/ray leonard era

mayweather is more talented but he isn't like pac or those throwback fighters
those throwback fighters had alot more pride back then

[Lacrimosa]

I`d say: very good!

At least he is not the guy, who is running from somebody... He is the guy who went through God knows how many divisions... He had lost couple times but managed to come back... His opposition is pretty strong (though some smarties would say he had only fought old, washed up fighters)... At last he is a 4-division champion and p4p #1...

So i would say again, his resume is very good, and he is future "Hall of Famer"

[Left Hook Tua]

sasakul was the #1 flyweight in the world when pacquiao beat him.

ledwaba was the #2 junior featherweight in the world when pacquiao beat him.

barrera was the #1 featherweight in the world and #3 p4p when pacquiao beat him.

morales was #2 super featherweight (the #1 was barrera who pacquiao had already beat) in the world and #6 p4p when pacquiao beat him.

marquez became the #1 lightweight in the world and #2 p4p after pacquiao beat him.

you be the judge.