Why does everybody exaggerate Morales-Pacquiao 1?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KILLA RIGHT
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2007
    • 8954
    • 294
    • 14
    • 16,348

    #31
    Originally posted by TheManchine
    Morales gave away the last round which made it closer.
    exactly he toyed with him pac could never pull somthing like that. Pac won some round but he didnt dominate round like erik did....by the way pac has never dominated a prime great fighter

    Comment

    • -Hyperion-
      The Best And Fastest Ride
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Apr 2006
      • 14176
      • 912
      • 1,378
      • 35,380

      #32

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #33
        Originally posted by dde91
        Okay, i watched the same fight as all of you. In some post i have read about this fight, some of you exaggerate your ass off. You make it seem Morales won every single round of this fight. That Pacquiao lost badly.
        Remember the scorecards were all 115-113. that means Morales edged it out and won 7 rounds of 12 in the match on all 3 cards. He did Beat Pacquiao Convincingly, i will admit that, but honestly do you think he really beat him with EASE?

        i think that this loss lets Pacquiao Haters feel good saying he got whooped badly to a Prime Morales, when in reality it was a close fight that Morales edged out.
        Certainly wasn't a domination but Morales did school him a little something that night. He outboxed him and, surprisingly, outbrawled him.

        Comment

        • Dragon Punch
          Contender
          • Feb 2009
          • 304
          • 8
          • 0
          • 6,357

          #34
          Originally posted by Thwf
          If you actually watched that fight, you should know that blood came from Pac`s cut due to a headbutt in the earlier rounds. And you should also have seen Morales staggered in the last round in spite of Pac fighting half-blind. Stop assuming dude.
          That's because Morales WANTED to fight toe to toe with Pac in the last round which is the reason he switched to southpaw.

          Comment

          • nujabes77
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2008
            • 8359
            • 535
            • 354
            • 16,443

            #35
            Originally posted by iron lung
            wow good job attempting to back pedal after you were completely owned in your own argument. what a ***** move.
            sigh... you're still misiing the point, the biggest point


            i hope you figure it out, for your sake

            Comment

            • nelsoncm
              i'm proud to be gay
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Nov 2003
              • 1846
              • 54
              • 0
              • 9,819

              #36
              Originally posted by iron lung
              look at pacquiao's face at the end of the fight and then look at morales face and tell me who was DOMINATED and owned. Morales destroyed pacquiao that night
              Beat, not destroyed.

              The disfigured face was caused by a headbutt. Despite being badly bruised, Pac managed to keep the fight close.

              The same can't be said in Pac-Morales II when Pac returned the favor of disfiguring Morales' nose and taking away his legs.

              Comment

              • them_apples
                Lord
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2007
                • 9912
                • 1,213
                • 904
                • 41,722

                #37
                Originally posted by dde91
                i feel they were to. It's just many are making it seem like Pacquiao barely won 2 rounds or something like that
                yea then they give him no credit when he got better and beat Morales. he also put on a few lbs as he was a much smaller man in the first fight.

                Comment

                • winac
                  Banned
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 507
                  • 13
                  • 1
                  • 596

                  #38
                  Originally posted by dde91
                  i tried saying that too, but everybody bashed on me, saying that Morales was Shot and old 8 months after the first fight. And that in the second fight he was no where near prime.


                  I think that is complete bull****. He was no where near SHOT
                  Regardless of whether he was shot or not he lost to Raheem before the second fight, which takes so much away from Pacquiao's victories over Erik

                  Comment

                  • S.G.
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 9412
                    • 296
                    • 635
                    • 16,360

                    #39
                    Morales was the better man in the ring.

                    Comment

                    • TheGreatA
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 14143
                      • 633
                      • 271
                      • 21,863

                      #40
                      Originally posted by KILLA RIGHT
                      exactly he toyed with him pac could never pull somthing like that. Pac won some round but he didnt dominate round like erik did....by the way pac has never dominated a prime great fighter
                      Marco Antonio Barrera

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP