Why does everybody exaggerate Morales-Pacquiao 1?
Collapse
-
-
-
Certainly wasn't a domination but Morales did school him a little something that night. He outboxed him and, surprisingly, outbrawled him.Okay, i watched the same fight as all of you. In some post i have read about this fight, some of you exaggerate your ass off. You make it seem Morales won every single round of this fight. That Pacquiao lost badly.
Remember the scorecards were all 115-113. that means Morales edged it out and won 7 rounds of 12 in the match on all 3 cards. He did Beat Pacquiao Convincingly, i will admit that, but honestly do you think he really beat him with EASE?
i think that this loss lets Pacquiao Haters feel good saying he got whooped badly to a Prime Morales, when in reality it was a close fight that Morales edged out.Comment
-
That's because Morales WANTED to fight toe to toe with Pac in the last round which is the reason he switched to southpaw.Comment
-
Comment
-
Beat, not destroyed.
The disfigured face was caused by a headbutt. Despite being badly bruised, Pac managed to keep the fight close.
The same can't be said in Pac-Morales II when Pac returned the favor of disfiguring Morales' nose and taking away his legs.Comment
-
Comment
-
Regardless of whether he was shot or not he lost to Raheem before the second fight, which takes so much away from Pacquiao's victories over ErikComment
-
Comment
Comment