Why does everybody exaggerate Morales-Pacquiao 1?

[J.B.moneY.]

i think the judges scored it correctly.....and it could have been easily 116-112, both merchant and lederman had it 116-112.....morales switched south paw in the 12th and almost got ko'd,,,,,that 115-113 is not as close as it looks

[TheGreatA]

Morales gave away the last round which made it closer.

[dde91]

what I saw in the last round was Morales TOYING with Pacman by going southpaw and still dominating and raping pac up the ass.

okay, so going southpaw one round makes him toy with Pacman ???

[iron lung]

Morales gave away the last round which made it closer.

ding ding ding.

The fight was not as close as the scorecards looked, Morales blasted Pacquiao and dominated him utterly

[dde91]

i think the judges scored it correctly.....and it could have been easily 116-112, both merchant and lederman had it 116-112.....morales switched south paw in the 12th and almost got ko'd,,,,,that 115-113 is not as close as it looks

true, There were rounds were it was action packed, and Morales came on top of those rounds. But it wasn't like Manny was getting Dusted in the dirt.

[dde91]

ding ding ding.

The fight was not as close as the scorecards looked, Morales blasted Pacquiao and dominated him utterly

DOMinated is a BIG word for that, i think he won Convincingly.

[Thwf]

what I saw in the last round was Morales TOYING with Pacman by going southpaw and still dominating and raping pac up the ass.

Then, it`s a fact you didn`t see the last round. Morales didn`t go southpaw in the last round, he got staggered. If that was 15 rounds he could have lost.

By the way, a trilogy is intended to decide who really ****s who. So if Pac won by 2-1, I wonder why you keep dreaming. Wake up! It`s 2009 already! Pac ****d and dominated your boy, weee !!!!

[talip bin osman]

DOMinated is a BIG word for that, i think he won Convincingly.

"dominated" is reserved for...

hopkins vs pavlik

pacquiao vs diaz

mayweather vs gatti

lennox vs tyson

JCC vs rosario

duran vs moore

those kinds of fights...

[dde91]

Then, it`s a fact you didn`t see the last round.

By the way, a trilogy is intended to decide who really ****s who. So if Pac won by 2-1, I wonder why you keep dreaming. Wake up! It`s 2009 already! Pac ****d and dominated your boy, weee !!!!

i tried saying that too, but everybody bashed on me, saying that Morales was Shot and old 8 months after the first fight. And that in the second fight he was no where near prime.


I think that is complete bull****. He was no where near SHOT

[dde91]

"dominated" is reserved for...

hopkins vs pavlik

pacquiao vs diaz

mayweather vs gatti

lennox vs tyson

JCC vs rosario

duran vs moore

those kinds of fights...

Yes i agree, and the Morales-Pacquiao 1 is a Convincing Victory like

Mayweather-Judah

Hagler-Duran

Duran-Leonard 1

De La Hoya-Whitaker

Tarver/Jones 3

and all those type of fights