Taylor beat Hopkins because...........

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ragingvic
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 1341
    • 46
    • 20
    • 7,495

    #21
    I scored both for taylor in close descions, its hard to argue robbery in such a close fight.

    Comment

    • Cortezsucks
      Banned
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 182
      • 8
      • 0
      • 229

      #22
      Hopkins met a guy he couldnt run hold and butt against.

      Like i said Hopkins when forced on the front foot loses.

      Comment

      • krispy kreme
        Fiendin for toilet water
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 10832
        • 358
        • 898
        • 18,913

        #23
        Originally posted by Cortezsucks
        Hopkins is never aggressive yet Taylor was so negative he made Hopkins force the fight.

        He lost. He cant fight on the front foot.
        That doesn't make sense, just say Taylor was too aggressive for Hopkins. First "Reverse Racism", now this.

        Comment

        • Bhopreign
          Banned
          • Jun 2006
          • 11273
          • 419
          • 100
          • 12,036

          #24
          Originally posted by -Hyperion-
          bhop lost because jermain pwns his ass....
          Why did Winky lose?

          Comment

          • Cortezsucks
            Banned
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 182
            • 8
            • 0
            • 229

            #25
            Originally posted by Tek My Pounches
            That doesn't make sense, just say Taylor was too aggressive for Hopkins. First "Reverse Racism", now this.


            ??????????????????????

            Everyone is more aggressive than Hopkins you tit. Taylor the first good fighter that is more negative (steal, cheat, hold, but, sneak) than Hopkins wins.

            Calzaghe is more aggressive and more but is ultra elite.

            Name someone more negative than Hopkins that fought him other than Taylor?

            One could say he is one dimensional.

            Comment

            • krispy kreme
              Fiendin for toilet water
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 10832
              • 358
              • 898
              • 18,913

              #26
              Originally posted by Cortezsucks
              ??????????????????????

              Everyone is more aggressive than Hopkins you tit. Taylor the first good fighter that is more negative (steal, cheat, hold, but, sneak) than Hopkins wins.

              Calzaghe is more aggressive and more but is ultra elite.

              Name someone more negative than Hopkins that fought him other than Taylor?

              One could say he is one dimensional.
              Why exactly did you call me a "tit"? Save that for Arreola, ****.

              I understand what you are trying to say. But, I was never taught that negative means aggressive.

              And what is ultra elite? Calzaghe does not have Hopkins skills as a fighter yet he is now ultra elite? Do you just make up words?

              Comment

              • Cortezsucks
                Banned
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 182
                • 8
                • 0
                • 229

                #27
                Hopkins cannot fight on the front foot. Thats why u have to give Taylor props he became the only man in history to become more negative than NARD.

                Comment

                • Cortezsucks
                  Banned
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 182
                  • 8
                  • 0
                  • 229

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Tek My Pounches
                  Why exactly did you call me a "tit"? Save that for Arreola, ****.

                  I understand what you are trying to say. But, I was never taught that negative means aggressive.

                  And what is ultra elite? Calzaghe does not have Hopkins skills as a fighter yet he is now ultra elite? Do you just make up words?

                  "??????????????????????

                  hopkins is Ultra elite.

                  Calzaghe is faster, better footwork, better feints and beat guys his size.

                  He is every bit as ultra as B-Hop, More so.

                  Comment

                  • krispy kreme
                    Fiendin for toilet water
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 10832
                    • 358
                    • 898
                    • 18,913

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Cortezsucks
                    "??????????????????????

                    hopkins is Ultra elite.

                    Calzaghe is faster, better footwork, better feints and beat guys his size.

                    He is every bit as ultra as B-Hop, More so.
                    Okay sure. What did you think of Hatton-Mayweather?

                    Comment

                    • ИATAS
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2007
                      • 36648
                      • 2,509
                      • 1,953
                      • 50,835

                      #30
                      Originally posted by -Hyperion-

                      bhop lost because jermain pwns his ass....
                      Not even you, a hopkins hater, can believe taylor "pwns his ass." You know he barely got those decisions, and if I recall it was Jermaine that nearly got knocked down or KO'd, not hopkins.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP