I scored both for taylor in close descions, its hard to argue robbery in such a close fight.
Taylor beat Hopkins because...........
Collapse
-
Hopkins met a guy he couldnt run hold and butt against.
Like i said Hopkins when forced on the front foot loses.Comment
-
Comment
-
??????????????????????
Everyone is more aggressive than Hopkins you tit. Taylor the first good fighter that is more negative (steal, cheat, hold, but, sneak) than Hopkins wins.
Calzaghe is more aggressive and more but is ultra elite.
Name someone more negative than Hopkins that fought him other than Taylor?
One could say he is one dimensional.Comment
-
??????????????????????
Everyone is more aggressive than Hopkins you tit. Taylor the first good fighter that is more negative (steal, cheat, hold, but, sneak) than Hopkins wins.
Calzaghe is more aggressive and more but is ultra elite.
Name someone more negative than Hopkins that fought him other than Taylor?
One could say he is one dimensional.
I understand what you are trying to say. But, I was never taught that negative means aggressive.
And what is ultra elite? Calzaghe does not have Hopkins skills as a fighter yet he is now ultra elite? Do you just make up words?Comment
-
Hopkins cannot fight on the front foot. Thats why u have to give Taylor props he became the only man in history to become more negative than NARD.Comment
-
Why exactly did you call me a "tit"? Save that for Arreola, ****.
I understand what you are trying to say. But, I was never taught that negative means aggressive.
And what is ultra elite? Calzaghe does not have Hopkins skills as a fighter yet he is now ultra elite? Do you just make up words?
"??????????????????????
hopkins is Ultra elite.
Calzaghe is faster, better footwork, better feints and beat guys his size.
He is every bit as ultra as B-Hop, More so.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment