I fell asleep during Hopkins-Taylor II so i wasn't able to score it.
Taylor beat Hopkins because...........
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Hopkins is SO negative he cannot win on the front foot. Hopkins is so defencive he gets all his opponents to chase him. In Taylor he met somebody more negative than himself and was forced to push the pace. Hopkins cannot do that, ergo he lost.Comment
-
Stop using the word negative man, nobody knows wtf you're talking about.Comment
-
bhop lost because jermain pwns his ass....Comment
-
Because Hopkins was past his prime. Yes, past his prime. He actually had a career before he met Tito believe it or not and his physical/athletic ability and aggressiveness was much better back then because he was younger and he also didn't have to worry about running out of gas. As he got older, he became stiffer and paced himself more to the point he was quite boring to watch. Hopkins had better power back then as well. Even Allen, who fought Hopkins a few times, said Hopkins wasn't as good as he used to be and his power was on the decline.Last edited by Benny Leonard; 04-17-2009, 05:32 PM.Comment
Comment