What's the difference between Kelly Pavlik and Carl Froch?
Collapse
-
-
I wouldn't say Pavlik's one dimensional . He even said after the Hopkins fight the weight slowed him down and he struggled to double up on his jab . This fight for me will tell if Froch's world class or not . Will he be able to keep his belt and his 0 or will he do a Junior Witter and get beat . Simialar situations , Witter calling out Hatton and Froch calling out Calzaghe , we'll see .Comment
-
P4P to date looking at the two records I would say Pavlik's the better fighter and well known for his power p4p as well .Comment
-
the same way mosley beat margarito
hatton and marg were meant 2 have iron chins like froch,and theres had been tested aswell,but they were 2 easy 2 hit and got ko'ed by relatively small punchers so dont give me this chin bull please its old taylor is miles ahead of froch in boxing skill.FACTComment
-
Comment
-
Pavlik has a much better resume than Froch. I think Carl has a decent chance to beat Taylor, but I definitely give the edge to Taylor.Comment
-
Taylor lost to Pavlik because Taylor totally lost his way after the BHop and Winky fights. I have no idea what happened to him but he just couldn't seem to cope with being the champ. Maybe he lost the drive he had as a challenger, I dunno. Earlier Taylor would have made a fool of Pavlik. Hell he almost did it in the first fight anyway and most referees would have stopped it.
As for now, I have no idea. I don't know why but I'm expecting Froch to freeze on the big stage.Comment
-
he will win the same way mayweather beat hatton.
the same way mosley beat margarito
hatton and marg were meant 2 have iron chins like froch,and theres had been tested aswell,but they were 2 easy 2 hit and got ko'ed by relatively small punchers so dont give me this chin bull please its old taylor is miles ahead of froch in boxing skill.FACTComment
Comment