What's the difference between Kelly Pavlik and Carl Froch?

[Chunk..]

One of em is one dimensional fighter who manged to beat Taylor twice. Carl Froch isn't one dimensional like Pavlik is, and he is also more powerful then the Pavlik who stopped Taylor in their first fight. This fight is at 168 as well.

I see Talyor getting KO'd.

[T.M.C]

pavlik is taller

[THE REED]

disagreement asside... ive noticed that ALL brits think froch will kill him and ALL americans think the opposite

[PAC-BOY]

disagreement asside... ive noticed that ALL brits think froch will kill him and ALL americans think the opposite

very true...I just don't know much about Froch. Seen footage but nothing special. Brits support there guy as to be expected... I can honor that. 777

[Adolf]

Taylor has terrible stamina aswell, or at least when he was fighting at 160.
Froch hasn't really fought many/any world class fighters so I'm not really sure just how good the guy is.

I think a Froch late tko is possible but I will say Taylor wins by decision.

Interesting fight.

[adietheforestfa]

Froch is far better than Pavlik

[Chunk..]

very true...I just don't know much about Froch. Seen footage but nothing special. Brits support there guy as to be expected... I can honor that. 777

You know what, i agree with that you to a certain extent, but Froch is a better fighter then Pavlik IMO, he manged to stop Taylor twice at 160. Froch has more power at 168 then Pavlik does at 160.

My mind is simple, but Froch has a very good chance in this fight. It's because he's unknown, that's why he isn't getting much backing in this fight apart from the Brits who have seen both guys fight.

[Memeori]

Pavlik is bald.

[RenegadeT]

Froch is far better than Pavlik

couldn't disagree more .

[ACHlLLES]

Froch is far better than Pavlik

Pavlik had a better resume before fighting taylor, froch is ****.
Frochs best win is pascal.