Who gets more credit for a win over Hatton. Floyd or Pac?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
What Im saying is, it isn't the height or reach, he doesn't possess the power or strength to "bully" true welterweights around... and personally thats all he has going for him in my opinion...
Sorry for being a **** about a paragraph ago.I love you deevel.
Comment
-
-
It depends as well on if Ricky presents the same kind of unique stylistic challenge to Pac as he did to Floyd. If Ricky fights with (is allowed to fight with) the style that can win him the fight, it's all the more remarkable if Pac pulls it off, because I'm not sure I see Manny first being able to stop Ricky getting inside and second being able to counteract what he does when he gets there. If Ricky fights in the more measured pace and style he did against Malignaggi, I see Pac's job being made a lot easier.
For Ricky's part, if he beats Manny in a clean technical performance without a hell of a lot of dirt, I will be shocked and hail him.Comment
-
Besides the fact people are saying Hatton has got better, im not convinced how much better you can get in such little time...but im not doubting him being able to do it
Back on the subject i think, pacman would get more credit...the fight is at light welter..the weight hatton has always claimed he is the best in the world at. Also if there is no question marks over the referee then if pacman beats him he will have way more credit for doing it...
Floyd has been tryin to get people out of their comfort zone....even what hes tryin with JMM rite now lolComment
Comment