Tweet
So tell me young one. During Roys reign at the top. When he ran through 160,168,175. Who at those weights was better than he was?
-
-
is farud like a new religion or something?
is this something i should know about?Comment
-
Hey well guess what, it doesn't even matter because Montell Griffith beat James Toney twice I believe. Then roy beat Montell's tail, got disqualified. Then came back and KO'd him in a minute. But Montell is nothing either right. Such a b----.Comment
-
Roy was losing 18lbs that is what Roy was losing and with dietitions and nutritionist that are going about these days dropping muscle can be down quite easily. Obviously Roy did lose a lot of muscle i'm not trying to say he wasn't drained badly because obviously he was but it is nowhere near as drastic as gets made out.....Like you just done two seconds ago when you stated he done this in 4 months. Obviously that is more horse**** you're spewing because the fight in question when Roy got KTFO was 14 months after Roy had put the weight on. James Toneys body mass and frame had been growing and it was making it physicaly impossible for him to get to 168, it wasn't PHYSICALY impossible for Roy to get down in weight especially after 14 MONTHS....Toney was DANGEROUSLY weight drained for his fight with Roy, to the stage where doctors were telling him not to fight.For the 3rd time now: Was Jones losing fat or muscle? Was Toney losing mostly fat or muscle? Theres footage of Jones weighing in unofficially, one is indeed his own scale which read 200 lbs, the second one was when they weighed him the night of the fight at the venue and that read 199.
I think youre just about done padding yourself on the back seeing you probably cant find any reason to do so. Youre about as ****** as your friend here who obviously lost his temper and hasnt said anything sensible for at least 5 posts. Im saying this because you seem to think he's actually winning a discussion
As i was saying, you should be more like CWR he atleast seems to know what he is talking about.
Obviously we dont know because he never fought all the top guys, its a matter of opinion. One taking an educated guess could say he'd probably have lost one or two fights against the top guys though...Not all them but probably some of them
Its a pitty we'll never know.
Its my cult, want to be in it?Comment
-
The biggest difference to me is that Toney was in his prime 28-30. Roy was 36 years old. He clearly wasn't the same fighter, and Roy still won. James got completely annialated by Roy. Toyed with. Then Roy went on to destroy the man that beat Toney. So all this talk about Toney is irrelevant. He never would have had a shot at Roy. Common now. Make excuses but in his prime he couldn't touch a prime Roy, and lost to Montell so forget about Toney. He aint on Roys level.Comment
-
Obviously we dont know because he never fought all the top guys, its a matter of opinion. One taking an educated guess could say he'd probably have lost one or two fights against the top guys though...Not all them but probably some of them
OMG you are just a hater. Its easy to see if someone is better even if they didn't fight. All you have to do is look at the body of work. Noone fights everyone. Its impossible. Do you know anyone else who beat Bernard, Toney, Griffith, and Ruiz. Do you know anyone from those weights with anything close to that. Your so full of ish it incredible. Your argument is now horse ish. You have nothing.Comment
Comment