Cotto vs. Clottey "Unification" Under Mandatory Threat

[oc9979]

i know i wanted this to be for the unified title so the winner could fight mosley for his title and the ring too

[street bully]

CLottey could pay his mandatory step aside money, but the man doesn't have enough money for himself let alone to pay off contenders.

[krispy kreme]

This is so ****ty. Fuck the IBF.

[oc9979]

dats what my brother said . That **** always happens to cotto last year with marg now again with clottey

i bet you the guy would love to fight for both title in one fight and for a bigger pay day

[dsol]

so in the last year the ibf has tried to stop two of the best fights in welterweight from happening, idiots. like why do have to vacate if your clearing fighting someone way better than their ****ty mandatory. sanctions try to ruin this ****ing sport, how is buddy even ranked #3. **** IBF

[KingTito]

That's bull****.

[jcarr71]

The belts are meainngless. This doesn't change a thing. The winner of this fight has to fight Mosley to determine the real welterweight champion either way.

[MANGLER]

Mother**** the IBF. He don't need the belt anyway cuz he's gonna get less $ than Cotto as is. Only point to him keepin it woulda been as a bargainin chip. There's the sheer principle of unifyin the belts, but even that don't matter much cuz everybody knows the score. SSM is #1, Cotto #2, and Clottey #3. Clottey should tell toss the ****in belt in a dumpster and tell the IBF to go fetch.

[larryx]

1 division 1 champion...those were the good ole days...**** i was happy with just the wbc and the wba

[lopez36]

acutually i think it's a good idea,i mean by the time the fight with cotto comes along,clottey would have been inactive for almost 11 months,thats too much for a fight this big (unification),,i think he should fight before fighting cotto