Joe Calzaghe. Controversial

[CiganoBoxer]

what a BS article ...it stinks !
Although i ain't a huge calzaghe fan ...i still respect him as a very good fighter/champion !

[Ray*]

Who were this other fighters that Joe could have fought??? If the writer is going to question is resume why not list those fighters that joe could have fought.

[SHB]

I wouldn't even know where to start pulling apart that article.

People like that should have their fingers amputated, although I suspect he wrote that article by bashing his head against the keyboard.

[Technical_Skill]

Who were this other fighters that Joe could have fought??? If the writer is going to question is resume why not list those fighters that joe could have fought.

I think Glen Johnson could have given him serious problems, even at 39 he is so relentless and has a decent defense, he beat chad dawson imo and no matter what the idiots tell you, chad has superb talent (thus why mayweather Jr says he's the best in the sport right now)

But the calzaghe marks will be quick to point out that johnson lost a fight, or more than one, and anyone who loses cant beat Joe.

Same old ****.

But Joe agreed to fight him, then pulled out, twice I think.

[Dynamite Kid]

Im all for hating on Joe, but you gotta hate with a bit of commonsense to validate your claims.

"Julian Jackson, Gerald McClellan, Roy Jones Jr., or Bernard Hopkins

I would be hard-pressed to believe that Calzaghe would have even been competitive with the likes of those fighters, but of course we’ll never know because he never ventured over the pond to fight them."

To say Cazlaghe wouldn't have been at the very least competitive with ANY of them is ridiculous. I hate Calzaghe, but he is a better fighter than that.

[gingeralbino]

I think Glen Johnson could have given him serious problems, even at 39 he is so relentless and has a decent defense, he beat chad dawson imo and no matter what the idiots tell you, chad has superb talent (thus why mayweather Jr says he's the best in the sport right now)

But the calzaghe marks will be quick to point out that johnson lost a fight, or more than one, and anyone who loses cant beat Joe.

Same old ****.

But Joe agreed to fight him, then pulled out, twice I think.

I agree about the road warrier, and as a Joe fan I was gutted when the fights were called of, it was at least twice, maybe even 3 times they agreed to fight, it would have been a very close, and very good fight. No-one beats Johnson easily.

[SHB]

Im all for hating on Joe, but you gotta hate with a bit of commonsense to validate your claims.

"Julian Jackson, Gerald McClellan, Roy Jones Jr., or Bernard Hopkins

I would be hard-pressed to believe that Calzaghe would have even been competitive with the likes of those fighters, but of course we’ll never know because he never ventured over the pond to fight them."

To say Cazlaghe wouldn't have been at the very least competitive with ANY of them is ridiculous. I hate Calzaghe, but he is a better fighter than that.

Well, two he fought (one of whom walked away from a contract 6 years earlier), one was a cabbage by the time Calzaghe was coming up to world class and another was fighting at light-middle at the time Calzaghe was fighting for a world title.

That's a REALLY ****ty and random list to beat him up with.

[SHB]

I agree about the road warrier, and as a Joe fan I was gutted when the fights were called of, it was at least twice, maybe even 3 times they agreed to fight, it would have been a very close, and very good fight. No-one beats Johnson easily.

It would have been fun. Shame it didn't happen. But, just like Calzaghe won 2-1 in terms of pulling out of the fight, I can't see any result apart from a Calzaghe UD.

[mines a pasty]

mate, this article is tame compared to some of his others on Calzaghe and Hatton

[mathed]

taken from another site. This is, i guess you'd say, a marmite article.

Thoughts?

Is Calzaghe the Worse Champion Ever?

By Scott Gilfoid:

This is kind of a subjective question, because for some boxing fans Calzaghe’s combination of his glittery unbeaten record and his 10 years of holding the World Boxing Organization super middleweight title is proof that Calzaghe was a good champion. I disagree completely with those people, and look more at the lack of quality fighters on Calzaghe’s record to make my conclusions about his time as a world champion.


There are obviously fighters who have held onto their titles for a much shorter time than Calzaghe, but I’m not referring to time having held a title in judging Calzaghe’s merits as a champion. After all, chances are Calzaghe might have only held onto his WBO super middleweight title for only one fight if he had stepped it up and fought a prime Julian Jackson, Gerald McClellan, Roy Jones Jr., or Bernard Hopkins.

I would be hard-pressed to believe that Calzaghe would have even been competitive with the likes of those fighters, but of course we’ll never know because he never ventured over the pond to fight them.

Instead of taking those fights and having to prove his self against the true best of the world, Calzaghe chose to fight opponents like Mario Veit, Kabary Salem, Evans Ashira, Mger Mrtchyar, Tocker Pudwill, Omar Sheika, Rick Thornberry, Juan Carlos Gimenez, and Luciano Torres.

Believe me, this is just a partial list of the fighters that Calzaghe chose to fight during a 10 year period. I haven’t even heard of most of those fighters and I’m astounded that Calzaghe chose to fight them. With talented fighters like Jones and Hopkins just across the sea, it would seem logical that Calzaghe would have raised a fuss and gone after both of them.

He didn’t, at least not until both were near or over 40-years of age. By then, the once blazing speed and incredible boxing skills had slowed down and eroded for both fighters. Hopkins aged much better than Jones Jr., but few people who believe that Hopkins as 43, the age in which Calzaghe fought him, was the same fighter he was when he was in his early 30s or late 20s.

As Calzaghe approached the end of his career, he finally stepped it up and fought several good fighters in Mikkel Kessler and Jeff Lacy, both decent opponents but not comparable to the fighter that Calzaghe should have been fighting earlier in his career.

In the final two years as a WBO super middleweight champion, Calzaghe had the opportunity to fight Carl Froch, easily the best super middleweight – besides Calzaghe – in the entire UK. But, instead of fighting Froch, which seems like the most obvious fight out there, Calzaghe chooses to fight Peter Manfredo Jr., a good 2nd tier super middleweight.

So even though Calzaghe held the WBO super middleweight title for 10 years or so, he fought precious few fighters I would consider talented and worthy of a title fight. That pretty much puts him in the class of being the worst champion ever as far as I’m concerned.

Calzaghe had his chance to be big, someone important, a fighter that could have achieved greatness by fighting Jones, Chad Dawson, Kelly Pavlik, Hopkins, Jackson and McClellan, but instead we saw Pudwill, Veit, Salem and many others like them. For me, that puts Calzaghe as the worst champion ever.

Why didn’t Calzaghe fight Dawson and those other talented fighters? Good question, but only he knows why not.

LOL, he fought Kessler instead...bum right. Then Lacy, who by the way was suppossed to be the next big thing....undefeated and a huge betting favorite- he got demolished. This article is trash, write something better.