Shane Mosley is Not Interested in Paul Williams, Either

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pullcounter
    no guts no glory
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2004
    • 42582
    • 549
    • 191
    • 49,739

    #131
    Originally posted by Dave Rado
    I'm well aware of that - my point is that's a contradiction in terms unless you think Williams isn't anyone.
    he's not contradicting himself, he's elaborating what "anyone" means. its a nuanced answer. but i get what you're saying

    Comment

    • Pullcounter
      no guts no glory
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2004
      • 42582
      • 549
      • 191
      • 49,739

      #132
      Originally posted by savorduhflavor
      Yea, that's the thing that bothers me.

      I know Shane doesn't duck anyone, and as far as I'm concerned he's done enough to fight whoever he wants.

      But for the life of me I don't understand why he would say that.
      what mosley means is both guys have fast hands and the fight will become pretty technical.

      Comment

      • Xcusemymood
        Undisputed Champion
        • Dec 2008
        • 1624
        • 67
        • 229
        • 7,760

        #133
        Originally posted by Dave Rado
        My point was that the WBO rated Jenning, a journeyman who was only ranked #50 by boxrec at the time, as their top contender - so he would have been Williams' mandatory if Williams had hung on to the belt; and Verno Phillips and especially Winky Wright are several leagues above Jennings. Someone in this thread thinks he'd be more credible if he fought bums like Jennings than if he fights a future Hall of Famer like Winky, and a solid highly rated fighter like Phillips, and I was responding to that.
        Wasnt trying to make a case about anything. Just thought it was

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP