Why is Mayweathers resume so thin compared to other fighters in the last 15 years ?

[The Gambler1981]

[QUOTE=JAB5239;4928089]

One again you've tried to make it sound like resume i the only thing I look at. Truth be told, it is the foundation of determining how good a fighter is. Wihout a good foundation anything you decide to build on top of it is on shaky ground.

QUOTE]

Ok. And how canyou have knowledge of a fighter if you don't know how good his opponents were?

You have already made my point, there is no need to continue to look foolish arguing over semantics.

You act like I took out resume from knowledge of a fighter? It is a part of it, but it is only a portion no more important than anything else really.

You should follow your own advice~ (from post 84).

[JAB5239]

[QUOTE=The Gambler1981;4928118][QUOTE=JAB5239;4928089]

You have already made my point, there is no need to continue to look foolish arguing over semantics.

Who looks foolish here really, the guy who made the point, or the guy who cannot logicly refute it?

You act like I took out resume from knowledge of a fighter? It is a part of it, but it is only a portion no more important than anything else really.

I've told you exactly why it is the most important thing in determining how good a fighter was. You haven't said anything but "its no more important than anything else really" and refuse to back your position up. So, are you or are you not going to back it up? If you can't don't worry about it, I'll be happy to move on to something else.

[The Gambler1981]

[QUOTE=JAB5239;4928169][QUOTE=The Gambler1981;4928118]

Who looks foolish here really, the guy who made the point, or the guy who cannot logicly refute it?



I've told you exactly why it is the most important thing in determining how good a fighter was. You haven't said anything but "its no more important than anything else really" and refuse to back your position up. So, are you or are you not going to back it up? If you can't don't worry about it, I'll be happy to move on to something else.

Like I said I do not care to change your mind. It is a subjective question, so to me trying to act like your view is the only right one looks to be the foolish one.

Whatever you say though go back and read what I said, if you can not understand what I am saying there is no point in going on.

A resume is who a fighter fought, who won, when and where. Nothing more, the knowledge that you apply to that resume is what is important in judging a fighter.


I would call your shocking lack of understanding foolish, yes~. If you think I have no point why did you push it this far? If you think I have no knowledge why try and prove your own against me? I do not care what your view is, and I do not care if you agree with mine, but I still think you are a fool.

[JAB5239]

[QUOTE=JAB5239;4928169][QUOTE=The Gambler1981;4928118]

Who looks foolish here really, the guy who made the point, or the guy who cannot logicly refute it?



I've told you exactly why it is the most important thing in determining how good a fighter was. You haven't said anything but "its no more important than anything else really" and refuse to back your position up. So, are you or are you not going to back it up? If you can't don't worry about it, I'll be happy to move on to something else.

[QUOTE=The Gambler1981;4928217][QUOTE=JAB5239;4928169]

Like I said I do not care to change your mind. It is a subjective question, so to me trying to act like your view is the only right one looks to be the foolish one.

Whatever you say though go back and read what I said, if you can not understand what I am saying there is no point in going on.

A resume is who a fighter fought, who won, when and where. Nothing more, the knowledge that you apply to that resume is what is important in judging a fighter.


I would call your shocking lack of understanding foolish, yes~. If you think I have no point why did you push it this far? If you think I have no knowledge why try and prove your own against me? I do not care what your view is, and I do not care if you agree with mine, but I still think you are a fool.

This is exactly what happened last time you tried to debate me. I backed you into a corner and al you had left was name calling. Lmao!!!

[The Gambler1981]

[QUOTE=JAB5239;4928254][QUOTE=JAB5239;4928169][QUOTE=The Gambler1981;4928118]

[QUOTE=The Gambler1981;4928217]

[/B]

This is exactly what happened last time you tried to debate me. I back you into a corner and al you had left was name calling. Lmao!!!

That is not how I recall it? Want to bump that thread?

I am glad that you disagree with me, it makes me feel better about my overall point of view.

Oh and using smiley faces is the real manly way to debate you know~>

[JAB5239]

[QUOTE=The Gambler1981;4928217]A resume is who a fighter fought, who won, when and where. Nothing more, the knowledge that you apply to that resume is what is important in judging a fighter.

Yet you don't seem to understand that without that resume and an undrstanding of it, the is no knowledge to apply.

[The Gambler1981]

[QUOTE=JAB5239;4928274]

A resume is who a fighter fought, who won, when and where. Nothing more, the knowledge that you apply to that resume is what is important in judging a fighter.

Yet you don't seem to understand that without that resume and an undrstanding of it, the is no knowledge to apply.

Listen, a resume is a start but you yourself called it the bottom line. The bottom line implies there is no more to be done, a resume is an imcomplete picture that without added information is almost useless in the gread scheme of things.

I never said resume was not important but that it was only part of the picture. I think you are a fool because you fail to understand something that I have clearly stated to you in replies like 15 times.

Like I said before ignorence is bliss~.

[JAB5239]

[QUOTE=The Gambler1981;4928266][QUOTE=JAB5239;4928254][QUOTE=JAB5239;4928169][QUOTE=The Gambler1981;4928118]

[QUOTE=The Gambler1981;4928217]

That is not how I recall it? Want to bump that thread?

Lol, you want to bump another thread when you can't even handle this one. Laughable!!

I am glad that you disagree with me, it makes me feel better about my overall point of view.

No it doesn't. If it did you wouldn't have felt so compelled to go on about it.

Oh and using smiley faces is the real manly way to debate you know~>[/

QUOTE]

Lol, only somebody worried about their own masculinity would even feel the need to sweat the smily faces.

[andrewcuff]

Joe Calzaghe looked good against Tocker Pudwill but I sure wouldn't use that as the main reason for calling him a great fighter.

[The Gambler1981]

[QUOTE=JAB5239;4928306][QUOTE=The Gambler1981;4928266][QUOTE=JAB5239;4928254][QUOTE=JAB5239;4928169][QUOTE=The Gambler1981;4928118]

Lol, you want to bump another thread when you can't even handle this one. Laughable!!


No it doesn't. If it did you wouldn't have felt so compelled to go on about it.

QUOTE]

Lol, only somebody worried about their own masculinity would even feel the need to sweat the smily faces.

Whatever you say, it must be true right?

I am perfectly fine with the way I think about the subject at hand. Say whatever you want, it does not bother me.

What I found funny is that you called me son (I am a grown man) yet you use something so juvenille as a emote smiley? Keep going on this path though it is cute, cupcake.