Pacquiao Says Marquez Trilogy Will Settle The Public Dispute

[Me La Pelan]

yep he can get more championship fights as much as he wants but we're talking about fighters who can give JMM as much as Pac can financially if they would fight. If Hatton loses to Pac, do you think it would be as big as it would be? who in the Jr ww is a PPV material excluding Hatton?

People in Britan support Hatton even in defeat. So YES Hatton losing to Pac then fighting at Wembley against JMM still sells out.

[BlackHat]

And of course he forgot who just said they wanted JMM too.

Look you're not following the conversation, you we're bashing Pac for asking the bigger split right? I'm just justifying it. If JMM would not agree to Pac's term, he isn't actually a big loss.

[BlackHat]

People in Britan support Hatton even in defeat. So YES Hatton losing to Pac then fighting at Wembley against JMM still sells out.

That would be his only option if he don't agree with Pac's term.

[MR.PLANAS]

Good news, this is the diference between Manny and the rest of the so called buisness man boxers i.e Floyd Maywhether, Roy Jones etc...

He doesn't walk away from challenges.


Even thought, I'd like to see what Manny could do with PBF, Floyd should take somebody his own size such as the winner of a Cotto vs Mosley rematch.

[Me La Pelan]

Look you're not following the conversation, you we're bashing Pac for asking the bigger split right? I'm just justifying it. If JMM would not agree to Pac's term, he isn't actually a big loss.

I wasn't bashing , I just said that now he says this but later he will start throwing in all kinds of demands... am I wrong???? I'm just saying Why doesn't Manny say what he wants first instead of hyping up a possible trilogy, because later if JMM doesn't want 30% people will say he ducked Manny when we all know that ain't true.

[BlackHat]

I wasn't bashing , I just said that now he says this but later he will start throwing in all kinds of demands... am I wrong???? I'm just saying Why doesn't Manny say what he wants first instead of hyping up a possible trilogy, because later if JMM doesn't want 30% people will say he ducked Manny when we all know that ain't true.

Why not tell JMM to say he wants 50% of the purse everytime he calls Pac?
instead of this BS I want to fight the best fighter.

[Me La Pelan]

Why not tell JMM to say he wants 50% of the purse everytime he calls Pac?
instead of this BS I want to fight the best fighter.

I'm not saying JMM deserves 50%.... I'm saying Pac DEMANDS 60% at the very least. That is BS

[BlackHat]

I'm not saying JMM deserves 50%.... I'm saying Pac DEMANDS 60% at the very least. That is BS

And I was saying that's fair enough for JMM since his last two fight were even televised for free.

[Calibre .223]

Why not tell JMM to say he wants 50% of the purse everytime he calls Pac?
instead of this BS I want to fight the best fighter.

Given the fact that JMM accepted all of Pac's conditions for their second fight, I would totally disagree with this statement. JMM got $1.5M to Pac's
$4M+. That is still over 62-38 in MP's favor. There is no excuse for Pacquiao not to fight Marquez on reasonable monetary terms.

[Calibre .223]

And I was saying that's fair enough for JMM since his last two fight were even televised for free.

So if he's making good money fighting on "free" television, why should he accept the same (or less) money fighting on PPV?! Would you do that?!