Who has the better resume?

[DarchinyFAN]

BTW when listing the 10 top fights I could have actually come down further with Barrera's as far as quality opponents go.

Alot of people think Barrera started when he fought Hamed or Morales the first time, but those fights were really leading into the second dominate phase of his career, he already had alot of great wins previously.

[Bushbaby]

Im closer to Trinidad,in ethnicity,but with that said,Barerra was the underdog against Prince Naz and beat the crap out of that man,in one of the best performances of my lifetime!!After being pummeled by Pacman,Barrera got his retribution in the rematch,by going the distance and despite lossing,fought well!!
Trinidad got a gift ud against DLH,dont get me wrong,he put together a string of impressive victories,but in the biggest fight of his career,in which he was the favorite,he took a helacious beating from B-hop and never looked that great again!!

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Tito does. better, wins, against better people!!!!!!!!!!!!

[warp1432]

How are Vargas and David Reid or whatever Trinidad's second best win is (excluding De La Hoya) better then Hamed and Morales? You can make an arguement for Hamed, but not Morales. Barrera beat Morales twice too...

[Dan...]

To me, resume means who you have beaten. On that basis, I am going with Tito.

I like them both but prefer Marco, so I can hardly be accused of bias on this one.

[DiegoFuego]

Uh Trinidad and easily

[HOMETOWNCHAMP]

I think Marco Antonio Barrera has a slightly better resume than Trinidad and at the time Barrera is still fighting and if he wins a lightweight title than i see him have a slight but clear adv resume wise(as long as its against a decent opponent and not someone on Kahns level).

[Fox McCloud]

Post MOAR answers!

[-MAKAVELLI-]

i voted Marco....no retirements after losses

[-Hyperion-]

since the de la hoya fight doesnt count for tito, and makes his ww run a bastardised alphabet, MAB easily....and i HATE MAB......

MAB was alos the far better fighter, p4p...