Shouldn't Calzaque be considered a better fighter than mayweather?

[strugler]

A lot of people consider mayweather a better fighter still. I dont get it, calzaque faced better fighters than mayweather did, he has more wins and knockouts. Mayweather milked his career, im not saying he is a bad fighter, but I dont think he did enough to consider himself a all time great. Who do you guys consider better?

Calazaghe didnt actually fight better competetion compared with money.

[Madvillain]

Floyd'd resume:

1 Corrales - B+ level fighter, not an elite fighter
2 JLC - tough fighter, but never really elite, defeated Floyd in their first fight
3 Oscar - OLD, well past prime
4 Hatton - past his best because he faded in the later rounds (declined after Tszyu) Floyd had referee's help
5 Genaro Hernadez - had been great in the early 90s, but a shot OLD fighter, his last fight
6 Zab - very limited fighter
7 Jesus Chavez - record of 1-13 when he fought Floyd

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php...4761&cat=boxer

8 Carlos Hernadez - good but not an elite fighter
9 Baldomir - limited and old, not a strong puncher
10 Gatti - shot OLD fighter
11 Manfready - good but not world-class level fighter
12 DeMarcus Corley - decent but not world-class level fighter
13 Gregario Vargas - limited opponent
14 Philip N'Dou - very limited opponent
15 Sharmba Mitchell - Tszyu handled him more easily TWICE, stopped a year younger version of Mitchell in the 3rd

46. Roy Jones - Shot, Far too old.
45. Bernard Hopkins - Past Prime, regardless of his win over Pavlik. Most critics believe Hopkins should have won.
44. Mikkel Kessler - Unproven
43. Jeff Lacy - Unproven, Vastly inexperienced
1 - 42. Nobodies

[xfiles]

Calzaghe's fought the worst competition and is the biggest fraud of any fighter on the planet including Butter Bean.

[Burner]

A lot of people consider mayweather a better fighter still. I dont get it, calzaque faced better fighters than mayweather did, he has more wins and knockouts. Mayweather milked his career, im not saying he is a bad fighter, but I dont think he did enough to consider himself a all time great. Who do you guys consider better?

Calzaghe hasnt fought better fighters.

Calzaghe doesnt have one attribute of skill that is better then Floyd.

Calzaghe isnt even a better fighter ATG sense then Mosley, Tito, Winky..etc.


Please stop with this bullshyt.

[AceNguyen]

Floyd'd resume:

7 Jesus Chavez - record of 1-13 when he fought Floyd

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php...4761&cat=boxer

WRONG Jesus Chavez, buddy

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php...8789&cat=boxer

When you criticize a guy's competition, try to get the fighter right. Jesus Chavez was a two time world champion at two different weights who would've been even greater if he didn't take a few years off after the unfortunate death of one of his opponents.

[βetamax]

WRONG Jesus Chavez, buddy

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php...8789&cat=boxer

When you criticize a guy's competition, try to get the fighter right. Jesus Chavez was a two time world champion at two different weights who would've been even greater if he didn't take a few years off after the unfortunate death of one of his opponents.

LOL

Way to call the boxrec warrior on this bonehead mistake.

[TheSurgeonMDMPH]

Thread stater seems nieve, but the other supporters of this filth are hilarious! KYS! You have the credibility of of kindergardener on this forum! Simple question, how many 40yr olders has pbf fought? Ok then! I say no more!

[miamijohn]

i think mayweather and calzage both did nothing in boxing to be be even concidered one of the greats. check out my blog at live4boxinh.blogspot.com. its more to the point. calzage gets no points from me for fighting hopkins(bad fight) wich he nearly lost. and both put him on his ass. but who other than kellser an lacy who is big for nothing and it shows. so for me.... they both suck. could be great but to be the best you must beat the best!!!!

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

a lot of people consider mayweather a better fighter still. I dont get it, calzaque faced better fighters than mayweather did, he has more wins and knockouts. Mayweather milked his career, im not saying he is a bad fighter, but i dont think he did enough to consider himself a all time great. Who do you guys consider better?

**** nooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[pistol whip]

I think both fighters were both very skilled boxers who never really challenged themselves against boxers with any equal skill.


Way to many B+ wins for two A+ fighters.

To be fair they both had one win against an A+ fighter.