Campbell-Funeka morning weigh-in

**Kball15** · 02-14-2009, 11:50 AM

SOunds pretty fair. should be a very interesting fight. I like Campbell and all, but im kinda rooting for Funeka. It is time for some new blood

**DiegoFuego** · 02-14-2009, 01:42 PM

Campbell is a loser. What is he even fighting for today?

**Scott9945** · 02-14-2009, 01:44 PM

Originally posted by DiegoFuego

Campbell is a loser. What is he even fighting for today?

He is fighting for the money, genius.

**egreezy** · 02-14-2009, 01:51 PM

Originally posted by DiegoFuego

Campbell is a loser. What is he even fighting for today?

you'd rather see two fights instead of tripleheader, whats wrong with you?

**DiegoFuego** · 02-14-2009, 01:53 PM

Originally posted by egreezy

you'd rather see two fights instead of tripleheader, whats wrong with you?

the titles aren't on the line and Nate says he's moving up to 140, so this fight is completely and utterly pointless to anyone not named Nate Campbell. just like Corrales-Casamayor III, but at least that fight had two top level fighters.

and I don't think you deserve a full paycheck if you don't make weight.

**lefthook2daliva** · 02-14-2009, 01:57 PM

Originally posted by DiegoFuego

the titles aren't on the line and Nate says he's moving up to 140, so this fight is completely and utterly pointless to anyone not named Nate Campbell. just like Corrales-Casamayor III, but at least that fight had two top level fighters.

and I don't think you deserve a full paycheck if you don't make weight.

It's utterly pointless if you are more concerned with rankings than the fights themselves...that you?

**egreezy** · 02-14-2009, 01:59 PM

Originally posted by DiegoFuego

the titles aren't on the line and Nate says he's moving up to 140, so this fight is completely and utterly pointless to anyone not named Nate Campbell. just like Corrales-Casamayor III, but at least that fight had two top level fighters.

and I don't think you deserve a full paycheck if you don't make weight.

If Funeka wins he gets the belts, Campbell cannot win them if he wins. But if he does wins it puts him in conversation for important fights like Marquez-Diaz winner, Barrera-Khan, or any champion/ contender @140.

**DiegoFuego** · 02-14-2009, 02:00 PM

Originally posted by egreezy

If Funeka wins he gets the belts, Campbell cannot win them if he wins. But if he does wins it puts him in conversation for important fights like Marquez-Diaz winner, Barrera-Khan, or any champion/ contender @140.

Campbell has blown any shot of fighting Marquez-Diaz winner or Barrera-Khan with this BS about not making weight. When you fail to make weight, you move up to another class. So like I said, this is pointless unless you're a Funeka fan and want Marquez-Funeka really bad.

**DiegoFuego** · 02-14-2009, 02:01 PM

Originally posted by lefthook2daliva

It's utterly pointless if you are more concerned with rankings than the fights themselves...that you?

when one guy weighs in a lot heavier than his opponent, the fight is a joke instantly. if Campbell wins, he had a huge advantage. if he loses with a weight advantage, he is a flat out joke. it's a no win situation for Campbell, but Funeka will look like a god if he pulls it off.

Campbell-Funeka morning weigh-in