Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nigel Benn: "Calzaghe Beats Me, Hagler, Hearns, Sugar"

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Danny nolan View Post
    lol if you say so fool y dont you go lynch a few english ppl or fasten some black ppl to a cross in ur white bed sheets.. sad act racist ****
    If "being racist" means destroying mental midgets like you....then yes...I truly am the #1 racist on this board.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by The C.E.O. View Post
      Don't worry, crusty...I won't Own you anymore....I feel bad for how I've treated you and am willing to show mercy upon you....
      cant some1 ban you of at least wrap a brick round ur head or burn u in ur kkk den or maybe stick u in jail with all the girly men and make you there ***** your a propper clown do you have anyfriends except ur sopts and **** colection ya sad little wanker i bet the only ***** you ever seen belongs to ur sister of mother ya racist redneck hillbilly ****

      Comment


      • Originally posted by znarfv_y2k8 View Post

        I just want to react w/ ur observation/comments specifically about Leonard & Hagler nothing about Joe or vice versa...maybe it's ur right to comment in this direction but i strongly disagree w/ it & i believe u disrespect Leonard for this...i'm a Hagler, Leonard, Hearns fan in anyway i'm fair to all of them & equally respect them...how could u say Hagler is not on his prime when both of them battles each other on 1987, Leonard is 31 & his 33 & they're very strong, skillful, w/ many very hard exchanges & very exciting battle w/c shows no weaknesses in any manner...if Hagler is not on his prime, he will be knockout early for sure because of the punches he received or vice versa...i believe no excuses should be laid here, its very clear that Leonard displayed more superior skills, elusiveness, speed w/ power, etc over Hagler's power, very strong chin, aggressiveness, etc...there's no argument when it comes to talent on both sides, i really respect both of them...that's why they're greats & their reputation is very high of this great magic 4: Leonard, Hagler, Hearns & Duran because they have a round robin battle of each other during their prime....
        wrong wrong wrong
        Duran was 29/30 when he fought Leonard he had been fighting at all diff weights and im sorry prime Duran was lightweight master Duran. Then when he fought Hearns and Hagler he was even further from his prime.

        Hagler was past his peak when he fought Leonard, the Mugabi fight took alot out of him and even in that fight he wasnt peak. Although the Duran fight kind of laid the blue print as how to do it, This is what confirmed for Leonard that he could beat Hagler as he saw him missing punches and taking punches that he wouldn't normally in the Mugabi fight

        Comment


        • Originally posted by The C.E.O. View Post
          If "being racist" means destroying mental midgets like you....then yes...I truly am the #1 racist on this board.
          mate im 6"3 and 13 stone a migit im not and as for destroying me id dance rings round u and slap you round a ring like a little hillbilly then after makin u cry like a girl id have to land a nice big left hook and knock ur racist head off then how did u say it go back to my bin dwelling country and bask in my own glory

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Danny nolan View Post
            ppl keep sayin hopkin is shot but obviusly he can be that shot if hes still in the p4p list and just whooped pavlik maybe hearns would have knocked the **** out of joe maybe joe would have got a lucky punch and Ko`d hearns in the first anything could have happened .. you think hearns would have won you dont no we would have won like i said no one expecter rahman to beat lewis but he did no1 knows what would have happened all ppl can do is speculate as to what they think could have happened

            I don't think you actually read my posts at all, where did i say Bernard Hopkins was shot ? read my post again i labeled Roy Jones as shot, not Bernard Hopkins. Secondly your saying i can't say Thomas Hearns would of won, then what the hell is the point of this conversation then ?

            If neither you or i can try and prove are point to the best of are ability ? thats the whole point of discussing mythical match ups. I think i've made some good points overall, i don't think you've countered many of my points. You keep going off topic about other fighters, and your not concentrating on the main subject in hand.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Danny nolan View Post
              cant some1 ban you of at least wrap a brick round ur head or burn u in ur kkk den or maybe stick u in jail with all the girly men and make you there ***** your a propper clown do you have anyfriends except ur sopts and **** colection ya sad little wanker i bet the only ***** you ever seen belongs to ur sister of mother ya racist redneck hillbilly ****
              Right about now....the handful of quality British Boxing fans' here are hoping YOU'LL be banned....lol

              I mean...just look at your posts....that's some serious angry and affected gibberish right there...

              Get a hold of yourself, boy.

              Comment


              • BAAHAAHAHAHAHHAAHA


                This is the funniest thread ive read in awhile

                He'd get outclasses by them all

                IF he gets KD but a shot jones, how would he take a right hand from Hagler or Hearns?

                not much better

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Burning Desire View Post
                  I don't think you actually read my posts at all, where did i say Bernard Hopkins was shot ? read my post again i labeled Roy Jones as shot, not Bernard Hopkins. Secondly your saying i can't say Thomas Hearns would of won, then what the hell is the point of this conversation then ?

                  If neither you or i can try and prove are point to the best of are ability ? thats the whole point of discussing mythical match ups. I think i've made some good points overall, i don't think you've countered many of my points. You keep going off topic about other fighters, and your not concentrating on the main subject in hand.
                  i dont think you read mine i said SOME PPL >>>>> S......O......M......E.. ppl not you at all so stoip puttin words into my mouth and get it right

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Danny nolan View Post
                    i dont think you read mine i said SOME PPL >>>>> S......O......M......E.. ppl not you at all so stoip puttin words into my mouth and get it right
                    Why are you copying me now ? jesus this is like arguing with a school kid honestly. Im done with this debate not that it ever was one in the first place, no wonder people on this site think brits are ****** with posts like yours.

                    Comment


                    • Lets look at facts Calzaghe has been nailed by

                      Eubank,Mitchell,Kessler,Jones,Hopkins,Reid all by the right hands and none of those guys punch like Hearns.

                      Jones is not even a big puncher really he has a lot flashy Ko's, but thats it, its his speed accuracy that does damage. I mean Roy hit David Telesco with everything he had a could not hurt him.

                      Kessler's KO record speak for itself good, but not a huge puncher.

                      Eubank hit harder than his record suggest, but he is still not a big puncher.

                      Reid clearly not a big puncher

                      Hopkins threw the Kitchen sink at Segundo Mercado in both fights and when he did finally stop him in the second fight it was after wearing him down, after consistently hitting him over and over with power punches.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP