POLL: Have Joe Calzaghe done enough to be considered an ATG (Top 100) ?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Grand Champ
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 12782
    • 968
    • 1,313
    • 23,079

    #1

    POLL: Have Joe Calzaghe done enough to be considered an ATG (Top 100) ?

    Let the opinions role in.
    65
    Yes, Calzaghe has done enough to be called an ATG
    49.23%
    32
    No, Calzaghe is not an ATG. He has not done enough to earn it.
    50.77%
    33
  • boxasmash
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2008
    • 7039
    • 222
    • 63
    • 14,591

    #2
    this isn't even questionable.

    of course he has.

    Comment

    • KESSLER
      GOONER FOR LIFE
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2007
      • 15487
      • 782
      • 716
      • 24,000

      #3
      lol, I'm sure we could fit him in Top 100.

      Comment

      • Fulcrum29
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2008
        • 4171
        • 171
        • 44
        • 4,430

        #4
        probably not.

        Comment

        • Grand Champ
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jul 2007
          • 12782
          • 968
          • 1,313
          • 23,079

          #5
          Originally posted by boxasmash
          this isn't even questionable.

          of course he has.
          It's a legitimate question. I'm not hating on Calzaghe, some people just wouldn't recognize fighting old hopkins and shot Jones to be enough to earn the place in the ATG.

          Comment

          • Grand Champ
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jul 2007
            • 12782
            • 968
            • 1,313
            • 23,079

            #6
            Originally posted by KESSLER
            lol, I'm sure we could fit him in Top 100.
            That would mean there would be no room for Mike Tyson who is ranked no 100.

            Comment

            • rizkybizness
              enjoy the silence
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jul 2007
              • 26337
              • 673
              • 356
              • 36,512

              #7
              LMFAOOO

              of course not

              Comment

              • KESSLER
                GOONER FOR LIFE
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2007
                • 15487
                • 782
                • 716
                • 24,000

                #8
                Originally posted by Grand Champ
                That would mean there would be no room for Mike Tyson who is ranked no 100.
                Any list with Mike Tyson being rated only 100 is bull****.

                Comment

                • boxasmash
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 7039
                  • 222
                  • 63
                  • 14,591

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Grand Champ
                  It's a legitimate question. I'm not hating on Calzaghe, some people just wouldn't recognize fighting old hopkins and shot Jones to be enough to earn the place in the ATG.
                  if calzaghe was 2-0 and only fought those fighters then no.

                  funny enough calzaghe is 46-0, 20 years unbeaten, 21 title defences, two weight champion, undisputed champion @ smw, only fighter ever to hold two ring magazine titles at the same time aswell.

                  Comment

                  • Guest
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    • 0

                    #10
                    Of course.
                    He has over 20 title defenses. You have to be special to achieve those sorts of numbers.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP