its a JC ting init mannnnn

**weekender101** · 02-03-2009, 09:15 AM

Jones is wicked, no hate at all.

**MACAQUEINBLACK** · 02-03-2009, 09:15 AM

Originally posted by weekender101

Lacy / Kessler. Both in their prime.

You MASSIVELY bigged up Lacy before the fight

"JC will get destroyed mannnnnnn BLA BLA BLA"

JC smashed him.

He Smashed Kessler

BOTH in their prime.

Then JC fights bumkins. "YEAH but BH is old mannnnnnnnnnnn"

BH smashed your big white all American Hope, the man with a girl�s name, Kelly"

BUMhop goes into most p4p top 10 lists for the win..........but..............YEAHHHHH man but like, he was OLD when JC fought him, but you know, not like errr as old as when he fought Kelly, which was like after the JC fight, so he should be older, but like........er (burp, chill dwog) he wasn�t.

OMG Americans.

Yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh but RJJ, man him SHOT.

Still only 2 ****ing years older than JC.

DO THE MATH YANKS

JC isn�t a young man, he's 37

Stop hating, start loving, big up THE BRITS

I'm British.

A Joe Calzaghe fan.

And the Roy Jones Jr. fight, though oddly compelling as a piece of sports theatre, was a complete waste of a fight in legacy terms.

The rest of your post died on its arse as soon as you referred to B-Hop as 'bumkins'.

It is funny to recall some of the comments about Lacy, though. Who remembers that one about Jeff being a whole "different class of fighter" to Calzaghe (or words to that effect)?

**MACAQUEINBLACK** · 02-03-2009, 09:19 AM

Originally posted by RunW/Knives

Prime Calzaghe v.s. Lacy = Lacy K.O. 2.

And I'm dead serious.

I am not trying to be fescisious like I normally am. I realize the brits get pissed off when I say that.

No pun intended. We are talking about two different classes of fighters.

**Roger Mellie** · 02-03-2009, 09:19 AM

Originally posted by Man In Black

I'm British.

A Joe Calzaghe fan.

And the Roy Jones Jr. fight, though oddly compelling as a piece of sports theatre, was a complete waste of a fight in legacy terms.

The rest of your post died on its arse as soon as you referred to B-Hop as 'bumkins'.

It is funny to recall some of the comments about Lacy, though. Who remembers that one about Jeff being a whole "different class of fighter" to Calzaghe (or words to that effect)?

The threads are still on here,but isnt it funny how the names of people have changed since then.I also liked the one where someone said they would stake their house,their bird and their mum,that joe wouldnt answer the bell for round 3.classic

**Roger Mellie** · 02-03-2009, 09:20 AM

Originally posted by Man In Black

whats runw/knives called now?

**weekender101** · 02-03-2009, 09:20 AM

JC haters just hate JC, not his record. His record is mint.

u.n.d.e.f.e.a.t.e.d.

Im not a fan of JC the man, but massively respect his record.

I've never understood that ****** mentalilty of only good boxers fight Americans. haha

Grow up

**Sugar May Floyd** · 02-03-2009, 09:22 AM

I don't get why you would discredit Hopkins when that was Calzaghe best win to date.

**weekender101** · 02-03-2009, 09:26 AM

Originally posted by Sugar May Floyd

I don't get why you would discredit Hopkins when that was Calzaghe best win to date.

I dont.

BH is still a wicked boxer. Just a shame people who hate JC always say BH was shot.

Joe has fought, and beaten, two absolute prime fighters in Lacy and Kessler when JC was in his mid 30.

He beat a legend in Eubank when he was young and in his mid 20's

Then he beat two aging legends when he himself was 36 years old

But the guy STILL cant do right.

**antworst** · 02-03-2009, 09:27 AM

hahahahahahahahahahaha all so true!

its a JC ting init mannnnn