Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Larry says Mayweather beats Pernell Whiitaker and badly

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Dynamite Kid View Post
    Your terminology for being Articulate= drawn out posts filled with blind nuthuggery.
    My posts have observations on fights by both fighters, your posts are a good example of how to be biased and reporting facts in creative ways.

    Consider your take on the Judah-Mayweather fight throughout this thread.

    First it was 5 rounds that Mayweather could not do Judah, then you realized you were wrong (your hating memory 'surprisingly' increased the number of problematic rounds).

    So later on you said Judah gave a 'boxing lesson' to Mayweather for 4 rounds.

    Judah won 3 rounds 1,2,4 (or 1,3,4 can't remember which one) -all of them close rounds, just like the one Mayweather won- So what went wrong in the 'lesson' in tha round? And how is winning close rounds a 'boxing lesson'.
    This is only one example of your hate blinding you, and why it is very easy to 'deal with your opinion', because you are so biased that it doesnt matter much.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by pbftxrs316 View Post
      wll, take it from a person whose seen most to all of pernell's fights. floyd beats pernell. he hit harder, he blocked much better, and fought off of the ropes better. he countered off of the block much better. pernell was more elusive with his upperbody movement but became too unorthodoz at times. floyd is, and read this very carefully, the most technically gifted fighter and overall most fluid fighter with speed and power of the last 4 decades. overall means, putting eveything together. him fighting southpaws and having trouble with them means really nothing when his adjustment to them was amazing. pernell imo wasn't faster than judah, but much better defensively. floyd was faster, hit harder, and is the smartest fighter i've seen ever in that ring. pernell was great, floyd is a genius fighter, he beats sweet pea. pernell may have fought what you guys call better competition, but floyd's skillset would be too much for him.
      Ok, I already knew you hold Floyd very high...

      Since I also happen to know you know the sport, I am curious to ask you how do you see the fight play out?

      Comment


      • IMO Whittaker vs Floyd would be as exciting as Oscar vs Floyd, maybe worse.

        When you get two fighters that are as tactical as both Floyd and Pernell, you have the makings of a possible snoozefest. It would be a defensive fight on both sides, but I'd give the edge to Pernell.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by wmute View Post
          My posts have observations on fights by both fighters, your posts are a good example of how to be biased and reporting facts in creative ways.

          Consider your take on the Judah-Mayweather fight throughout this thread.

          First it was 5 rounds that Mayweather could not do Judah, then you realized you were wrong (your hating memory 'surprisingly' increased the number of problematic rounds).

          So later on you said Judah gave a 'boxing lesson' to Mayweather for 4 rounds.

          Judah won 3 rounds 1,2,4 (or 1,3,4 can't remember which one) -all of them close rounds, just like the one Mayweather won- So what went wrong in the 'lesson' in tha round? And how is winning close rounds a 'boxing lesson'.
          This is only one example of your hate blinding you, and why it is very easy to 'deal with your opinion', because you are so biased that it doesnt matter much.



          Im not going round in circles with over this. I say Whitaker would beats Floyd clearly/ decisively thats my opinion. No hate involved i think stylistically he has too much for Mayweather.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Dynamite Kid View Post
            Im not going round in circles with over this. I say Whitaker would beats Floyd clearly/ decisively thats my opinion. No hate involved i think stylistically he has too much for Mayweather.
            You can claim there is no hate involved, but many things point out that there is hate involved (see your description of the Judah fights)

            Comment


            • Originally posted by wmute View Post
              You can claim there is no hate involved, but many things point out that there is hate involved (see your description of the Judah fights)
              I made that comment to annoy you, because ive spoken to you before and i already know what a fanboy you are.

              I said i said what i said, because i believe Floyd loses to Whitaker.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Dynamite Kid View Post
                Im not going round in circles with over this. I say Whitaker would beats Floyd clearly/ decisively thats my opinion. No hate involved I think stylistically he has too much for Mayweather.
                In what way? This is Pernell Whitaker we're talkin about NOT Roberto Duran.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by El Dominicano View Post
                  In what way? This is Pernell Whitaker we're talkin about NOT Roberto Duran.
                  Well what ever the case maybe i dont think anyone is better suited to beating Mayweather's style than prime Whitaker.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by cortdawg25 View Post
                    Ima go with Floyd too. Not becuase of skill or power but because of focus. Sweet Pea BS too much for me to say he could beat floyd. And he as struggled with lesser boxers than floyd too (even thoug it wasn't in his prime). All that dancing and showboating would make him get caught and he didn't come from defense to offense like Floyd either. Also floyd throws single shot agianst fighters who are bigger and got some pop to hurt him. Pea is not bigger nor has the pop to do serious damage to him. Floyd would box with more of jab and more punches if they fought and he would win that inside fight. Whitaker struggled with McGirt twice on the inside in the pocket.
                    I still say this would go either way. I got alot of respect for both of these guys. As for the bold, Whitaker wouldn't showboat against a fighter as fast and as accurate as Floyd...it wouldn't be smart. Whitaker knows when to get serious and when to have fun (Except in the DLH fight ofcourse, which he won in my opinion anyway) All in all, this would be my dream fight and I'd throw in 100 bucks if it ever were possible for me to watch it

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by El Dominicano
                      I know but when you say TOO MUCH...I don't get it. Too much in what way? Mayweather has seen better power, speed...Look listen, Nothing against you but I understand that Mayweather never faced a slick defensive accurate counter puncher like Whitaker...then again YOU HAVE TO ADMIT! The same could be said to Whitaker


                      SO WHERE DOES THAT LEAVE ANY OF US?

                      Agreed

                      That said you must also conceed that Whitaker has beaten better fighters. Floyd did'nt have an easy time of it with Castilo,Chavez,DLH or even Sosa.

                      Where as Whitaker dodged the bullet against Chavez and Nelson and you know both those guys bring it far more than Castillo and Jesus Chavez they are both better fighters for a start.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP