I disagree since Oscar vs Hatton would have made a ton more money.
Its clear to me that Oscar vs. Pacman ws a setup for GBP to make $$ off Hatton-Pac!
Collapse
-
Tell me a time that it made the MOST financial sense that Oscar opted to not fight a fighter on his roster?
For the record, even though Mayweather had to sign to him to fight him, I'll discard that.Comment
-
No Oscar was just old and shot, the lower weight was just the straw that broke the camels back.
Oh and Ray Hatton said in public that the negotiations for pac-hatton didn't start untill after the Pac-ODLH fight.Comment
-
why would oscar risk his legacy and get his ass whupped by a midget???
this thread reminds me of that southpark episode where 1/4th of the public are ******s.Comment
-
I see that there are a few ppl on here that like to make up lies. Mayweather was never signed under GBP, de la hoya just had rights to his next fight. thats it!! That is difference then beating someone on your roster and damaging his marketbility.Comment
-
No setup, all legitimate... the fight with Oscar and Manny was made to make millions, to lead to Hatton facing the winner... which turned out to be Pacquiao, nothing more... nothing less.Comment
-
I said he signed to him, in order to fight him. Which by your own admission he did.
How about YOU try not making up lines.
He had to sign away promotional rights, which was my point. And if Oscar beat the hell out of Mayweather, wouldn't that have been technically bad marketing of a huge money maker for him?Comment
-
I didn't say he was apart of the promotional company. Don't put words in my mouth on a forum, because it's easy to facts check.
I said he signed to him, in order to fight him. Which by your own admission he did.
How about YOU try not making up lines.
He had to sign away promotional rights, which was my point. And if Oscar beat the hell out of Mayweather, wouldn't that have been technically bad marketing of a huge money maker for him?Comment
Comment