Its clear to me that Oscar vs. Pacman ws a setup for GBP to make $$ off Hatton-Pac!

[baCCaT]

ODH vs HATTON would've gotten more money than the ODH vs Pac
so the poll to me isnt applicable

[ИATAS]

****** idea. If Oscar would have beat Pacquiao, it would have set up Oscar vs Hatton. Oscar would make a **** load more money from that then a percentage from promoting pac/hatton. smh

[tjose385]

****** idea. If oscar would have beat pacquiao, it would have set up oscar vs hatton. Oscar would make a **** load more money from that then a percentage from promoting pac/hatton. Smh

what part of oscar will not fight one of his own fighters aren't you all understanding?????? Just because he said he wanted hatton next doesn't mean he meant it!!!!!

[Sin City]

you are an idiot, why?? because if De La Hoya would have won there would have been MUCH more money in De La Hoya vs. Hatton and then a rematch with Mayweather.
Pacquiao isn't under Golden Boy like Hatton is and therefor you have to split the money with Top Rank. If Hatton and DLH fought it would all be going to GBP.

Stop with your ****** conspiracy theories.

[tjose385]

I see that your a moron. He wont fight any of his own fighters.

[ИATAS]

what part of oscar will not fight one of his own fighters aren't you all understanding?????? Just because he said he wanted hatton next doesn't mean he meant it!!!!!

why wouldn't he??? That's horrible logic because that's all the money going straight to oscar. If the arguement here is that Oscar is so damn greedy that he would FIX A FIGHT, you think all of a sudden he has morals and wouldn't fight one of his own fighters? LMAO!!! SOOOO much more money would be made for oscar, not a percentage. simple logic people, try to use it please.


I'm tired of seeing after every single upset in the sport dumb people unite and make threads about how the loser fixed the fight. Let it go people, upsets happen and it's not like oscar is in his prime he looked like **** against Stevie Forbes. smh

[Burner]

Oscar fought Pacman in ordet to set up Hatton vs. Pacman.

Thats the point of this thread.

Oscar is 35....and hasnt made 147 in 12 years....and even looked like crap aginst Steve Forbes....Oscar knew he would lose to Pacman....this fight was a fantasy fight myth until merchant mentioned it so get out of here.

[ИATAS]

Oscar fought Pacman in ordet to set up Hatton vs. Pacman.

Thats the point of this thread.

Right, and we are pointing out your entire point is absurd because if Oscar wins, it would have set up oscar vs hatton which would make A TON MORE MONEY FOR OSCAR. Or better yet, he could have just fought HATTON instead of pacquiao.

Oscar is 35....and hasnt made 147 in 12 years....and even looked like crap aginst Steve Forbes....Oscar knew he would lose to Pacman....this fight was a fantasy fight myth until merchant mentioned it so get out of here.

Ok, so now you're saying he "new he would lose?" lmao, delete thread immediately you're making yourself look foolish! He was fighting Pacquiao not king kong.

[Sin City]

Oscar fought Pacman in ordet to set up Hatton vs. Pacman.

Thats the point of this thread.

Oscar is 35....and hasnt made 147 in 12 years....and even looked like crap aginst Steve Forbes....Oscar knew he would lose to Pacman....this fight was a fantasy fight myth until merchant mentioned it so get out of here.

How does that change the fact that if Hatton and DLH would have fought all the money would have went to GBP.

Hatton fighting Pacquiao means they have to split it with Top Rank.
You are using fool's logic, son.

[RL_GMA]

Oscar didnt even try aginst Pacman.....hell he didnt even go for broke.

Shameless.

All for the money that Pac vs. Hatton will make....In the philliphines..Vegas..the UK....PPV ...this fight will sell big time...and guess whos promoting the fight....


Oscar himself.

Yea, because Oscar trained for 3-4 months, spent money on trainers, facilities, etc...all to take an ass whipping.

LOL...what is this, Illuminati? LMAO