Margarito cleared of wrongdoing in july 2008 over Cotto!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SalvaDominicano
    Future Middleweight Champ
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2004
    • 2072
    • 92
    • 45
    • 9,317

    #61
    Originally posted by el guason456
    a neutral party, i thought i would never see one in this thread....as for the article, it helps that Keith Kizer spoke out on this situation and "cleared" Margarito. Cotto/Margarito was the biggest fight of '08, why wouldnt the NSAC be on top of their game? Still, this isnt official, so im not going to rejoice or anything like that.
    That's true. You'd think they would have eye for this sort of thing.

    Comment

    • SalvaDominicano
      Future Middleweight Champ
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2004
      • 2072
      • 92
      • 45
      • 9,317

      #62
      Originally posted by lefthook2daliva
      Could very well be. Thing is we'll never really know...

      At first I was thinkin' Cotto should skip the Margarito rematch, but maybe it would help to give an indication one way or another whether Marg's 1st victory was indeed legit.

      Besides, it's bound to be a great fight.

      Mosely to rematch the winner?
      Mosley is now the Welterweight champ. I'd like to see him fight someone credible and not take Oscar's route of fighting smaller fighters.

      Comment

      • LEFTYGUNZZ
        GUNZ 4 HIRE
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2008
        • 4264
        • 218
        • 184
        • 10,891

        #63
        Originally posted by margacheeto
        once again WE ALREADY KNEW THAT.

        What the **** is wrong with everyone? Really? NVA and Cottos camp saw the wrapping of the hands ? NO **** SHERLOCK.

        doesn't mean he wasn't able to sneak something by them if you see the mosely fight it wasn't UNTIL nazeem complained for a rewrap (the hands were already inspected and wrapped at that point) that something fell out.

        if he could get it by in the mosely fight why not before?


        there is NO PROOF he did or did not do it for the cotto fight.

        dumbasses.

        that being said, once a cheater probably always a cheater
        If he was using a powery substance that hardens when it gets wet then it could be concealed by the tape and wraps. Even if it is pressed on and checked with out being unwrapped you probably wouldnt see it. It would explain why heis punches get harder as the fight goes on. his hands start to sweat and the powder gets wet and hardens around his knuckles and hands. If it is true hopefully for his sake and the sake of the sport of boxing it aint true.....Lefty

        Comment

        • dans
          Journeyman
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2006
          • 6835
          • 212
          • 134
          • 13,712

          #64
          Anytime I open a thread from this guy, I immediately assume it's BS. Even if he is telling the truth, it doesn't prove anything, so I'll wait for something official. Anyone who just flat out believes this is ******.

          Comment

          • paulsinghnl
            Student of the game
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Nov 2008
            • 834
            • 28
            • 25
            • 7,304

            #65
            yeah no Clottey or Berto, they ain't ready yet, although they could fight each other.... Williams would be a good fight for mosley.. but not gonna happen.. Cotto, Mayweather maybe. Pacquiao is too small, so is Hatton, although that might be entertaining after the Pacquiao matchup.

            Comment

            • lefthook2daliva
              huh?
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2008
              • 5569
              • 190
              • 594
              • 18,317

              #66
              Originally posted by SalvaDominicano
              Mosley is now the Welterweight champ. I'd like to see him fight someone credible and not take Oscar's route of fighting smaller fighters.
              This post makes no sense.

              Who is smaller than Mosely out of these two (Cotto/Margarito)? Who is not credible?

              If Margarito beats Cotto again ,the argument could be made that he did just have a bad night against Mosely at the same time that Mosely was having an exceptional one. If Cotto beats Margarito in the rematch, he still owns a "W" over Mosely...

              What do you mean? Please clarify.
              Last edited by lefthook2daliva; 01-27-2009, 04:02 PM. Reason: clarity

              Comment

              • Anto
                Interim Champion
                • May 2006
                • 514
                • 60
                • 0
                • 6,861

                #67
                a picture scan can show if something was inside.

                archeologists do it all the time , you can see inside even from a picture or video with a scan. a color scan.

                Comment

                • Don Corleone
                  The Don
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 3748
                  • 143
                  • 208
                  • 11,159

                  #68
                  Originally posted by -Antonio-
                  The reality is, most of these guys want to believe that Margarito cheated to beat Cotto when he most likely didnt.
                  I agree. Now can people STFU and let the Cotto loss go and leave it as it is? I mean really. I'm a huge Mosley fan but I can't stand all this talk about Margarito cheating in the Cotto fight. Cotto lost plain and simple. He's one of my favourites but fighters lose. It's part of the sport...

                  Comment

                  • savorduhflavor
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 8194
                    • 288
                    • 59
                    • 14,875

                    #69
                    This is the biggest waste of time. Are you guys serious buying into this?

                    This is the Vegas commission saying THEY DIDN'T DO ANYTHING WRONG BECAUSE THEY KNOW NOTHING CAN BE PROVEN. They are saving their own asses because in a situation like this where everything would be circumstantial, it's easy to.

                    But in reality this article proves jack ****.

                    Comment

                    • oc9979
                      Bad Intentions
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jul 2008
                      • 7192
                      • 304
                      • 226
                      • 14,354

                      #70
                      Originally posted by americanme
                      cuz the nevada statle athlectic commision and cotto camp saw nothing wrong w/the wrapping of his hands...they witnessed the taping wrapping etc
                      ...just like the CSAC did Sat night ..

                      nice name lol...


                      they did so good that richardson had to tell them to recheck. one of his had was already wrap and mark. so they did a good job checking it

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP