Margarito should do the right thing and rematch Mosley

[Sin City]

I totally agree with you.. Margarito isn't going to want to fight Mosley again when he got beaten so badly. I question every win Margarito has ever had now because of trying to use plaster with his wraps. I wouldn't be surprised if he used them in the Cotto fight. Look how badly he was cut up.

you are on here to? dang, you every where! lol

[americanme]

Ahh ok following you line of toughts Shane Mosley should not fight Marg again because he already beat him, jajaja what an idiot you are. You are trying to legitimize a fight that was from the start one sided and marg does not even win one round, and in other hand you are triyng to discredit a rematch for a fight that in the first one the looser was dominating in the whole firts half. I just not see coherence and logic in the way you think. I guess is that you are so hurt because your boy lost to shane that you doesnt want to wait too long for a second fight to be made because you have some hope that you boy can win in the rematch. Let me tell you, you are not the only one, there are fans of other fighters aswell that wan to see thier favorite fighter avenge thier defeats. And even more if the fight was close, entertaining, and both are in the same position at the same time ( Cotto and MARG).

yeah Marg isnt quite his boy.... tho.

[Mr. Ryan]

Ahh ok following you line of toughts Shane Mosley should not fight Marg again because he already beat him, jajaja what an idiot you are. You are trying to legitimize a fight that was from the start one sided and marg does not even win one round, and in other hand you are triyng to discredit a rematch for a fight that in the first one the looser was dominating in the whole firts half. I just not see coherence and logic in the way you think. I guess is that you are so hurt because your boy lost to shane that you doesnt want to wait too long for a second fight to be made because you have some hope that you boy can win in the rematch. Let me tell you, you are not the only one, there are fans of other fighters aswell that wan to see thier favorite fighter avenge thier defeats. And even more if the fight was close, entertaining, and both are in the same position at the same time ( Cotto and MARG).

I love it when little kids who can't handle different opinions call names, it's self-pwnage. It's hard for me to read with all of the incorrectly spelled words and the lack of paragraphs, but I'll give it a try.

I want to see Margarito avenge his defeat, he was thoroughly beaten and a champion should always seek a return with the man who takes his title.

Cotto can avenge his defeat as well, and I think part of the thinking is hmm, was this guy cheating when he beat me, is he deteriorated enough for me to catch up to him.

I just think that when you get your ass kicked in between a rematch, that all bets are off, you don't get the carrot on the stick as if you weren't beaten up.

[Mr. Ryan]

yeah Marg isnt quite his boy.... tho.

I have no boy, my boy is the sport of boxing.

[Massage Queen]

I take what Jim Lampley and Larry merchant say w/ grain of salt. Iim waiting for the official statement from the CASC.

not saying he is innocent but he hasnt been found guilty of anything yet.

Shane has..little bias are we?

To be honest I'm never bias just because I like a fighter. Shane is totally wrong for doing steroids. I was very disappointed when I heard about that. As far as waiting for an official word. It sounds pretty official to me when the evidence is right in front of them. There could very well be criminal charges against Margarito for that. I always like Margarito as a fighter. You'll never catch me being a hater. If I like or don't like someone there's a reason for it.
What I find funny is ppl that are die hard fans for someone, and they'll make a million and one excuses for them regardless of what the situation is. There's no excuses for Mosley using steroids. So I'm not about to make one up for him.

[americanme]

I love it when little kids who can't handle different opinions call names, it's self-pwnage. It's hard for me to read with all of the incorrectly spelled words and the lack of paragraphs, but I'll give it a try.

I want to see Margarito avenge his defeat, he was thoroughly beaten and a champion should always seek a return with the man who takes his title.

Cotto can avenge his defeat as well, and I think part of the thinking is hmm, was this guy cheating when he beat me, is he deteriorated enough for me to catch up to him.

I just think that when you get your ass kicked in between a rematch, that all bets are off, you don't get the carrot on the stick as if you weren't beaten up.

carrot on the stick, like how? he made more money fighting Shane then Cotto.. he would get his belt back fighting Shane NOT Cotto..so only carrott is that he MIGHT when the rematch w/Cotto?

forgive me if i misspelled any words, sir.

[Smunoz]

i also believe that Cotto has the responsibility to give Shane his rematch, when shane feels that he want it. For know shane has the momentum and he is the guy that hold the options, but if cotto can win vs jennings and if he look great and later can beat Marg well that puts him in a better position to fight Mosley. First things first ( Jennings) he has first a lot of questions to answer like what is his condition and if he is the same fighter that was before the fight with Marg.

[Mr. Ryan]

carrot on the stick, like how? he made more money fighting Shane then Cotto.. he would get his belt back fighting Shane NOT Cotto..so only carrott is that he MIGHT when the rematch w/Cotto?

forgive me if i misspelled any words, sir.

There are definitely arguments that can be made for Cotto or Mosley getting the next fight with Margarito. I just think it shows greater pride to fight the guy who beat you as opposed to a guy who you have already beaten.

Mosley beat Margarito and has been seeking a rematch with Cotto, who took a decision against him. The way I see it, the winner of a Margarito-Mosley rematch should get Cotto, who represents the highest money earner of them all. But then again, Top Rank is likely to circle the wagons here.

[americanme]

To be honest I'm never bias just because I like a fighter. Shane is totally wrong for doing steroids. I was very disappointed when I heard about that. As far as waiting for an official word. It sounds pretty official to me when the evidence is right in front of them. There could very well be criminal charges against Margarito for that. I always like Margarito as a fighter. You'll never catch me being a hater. If I like or don't like someone there's a reason for it.
What I find funny is ppl that are die hard fans for someone, and they'll make a million and one excuses for them regardless of what the situation is. There's no excuses for Mosley using steroids. So I'm not about to make one up for him.

Im not making ANY excuses for MARGARITO.. but he hasnt been found guilty of anything yet.

if the results are that plaster is found in the gauge then he gets what he deserves..

you said you respect every boxer except those who cheat, then when I mentioned Mosley just seems you jumped on Margo..when he hasnt been found guilty of anything thus far. Richardson complains all the time about too much wrapping etc..so Im waiting for the CASC to give an official ruling on the matter. Just like the offical one that was giving on Shane AFTER the BALCO steroids investigation.

[americanme]

There are definitely arguments that can be made for Cotto or Mosley getting the next fight with Margarito. I just think it shows greater pride to fight the guy who beat you as opposed to a guy who you have already beaten.

Mosley beat Margarito and has been seeking a rematch with Cotto, who took a decision against him. The way I see it, the winner of a Margarito-Mosley rematch should get Cotto, who represents the highest money earner of them all. But then again, Top Rank is likely to circle the wagons here.

I agree w/this because Marg was dominated and stopped. But if they go through w/Cotto/Marg and the winner getS the Shane/Clottey winner, im DOWN WITH IT.