Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

There's not even one, active, British boxer in today's Top 10 P4P list...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by GreatJoe View Post
    I shouldn't have to fight, unless someone tries to steal it because they are insecure about the number of fighters THEY have.

    "Oh well if you have Calzaghe then we HAVE to have Mayweather back"

    LOL ****s pathetic
    Yeah....you truly are...."please....PLEASE let us have 1 in the Top 10!"....

    We got like half the damn list covered....lol...only a perfectionist would be insecure about that....

    Boxing Excellence and America are synonomous for a reason, villager....

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by The C.E.O. View Post
      Yeah....you truly are...."please....PLEASE let us have 1 in the Top 10!"....

      We got like half the damn list covered....lol...only a perfectionist would be insecure about that....

      Boxing Excellence and America are synonomous for a reason, villager....
      You have 2, maybe make a stretch for 3 with PW.

      Lmao, are you Americans that **** at maths?

      Comment


      • #23
        last time I checked.....the Brits won ALL the head to heads against us last year with the exception for Witter-Bradley ......plus their Big 3 of Calz, Haye and Hatton combined to go 6-0 with 3 KO's......our Big 3 of Hopkins, Pavlik and Mosley went 4-2 with 2 KO's.....men lie, women lie, but numbers don't! But its a new year, just let it play itself out before you go and bash the Brits.......so far they got braggin' rights.......until Hatton gets brutally KTFO by Pac and Floyd takes Pac to school.....we got to fall back, but until then...... to the Brits!

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by GreatJoe View Post
          You have 2, maybe make a stretch for 3 with PW.

          Lmao, are you Americans that **** at maths?
          From this very site where you and your cousins live and pollute...


          1) Manny Pacquiao (48-3-2, 36 KO’S)

          2) Joe Calzaghe (46-0, 32 KO)

          3) Bernard Hopkins (49-5-1, 32 KO)

          4) Juan Manuel Marquez (49-4-1, 36 KO)

          5) Shane Mosley (46-5, 39 KO)

          6) Israel Vasquez (43-4, 31 KO)

          7) Ivan Calderon (32-0, 6 KO)

          8) Paul Williams (36-1, 27 KO)

          9) Rafael Marquez (37-5, 33 KO)

          10) Chad Dawson (27-0, 17 KO)


          Originally posted by SekondzOut View Post
          last time I checked.....the Brits won ALL the head to heads against us last year with the exception for Witter-Bradley ......plus their Big 3 of Calz, Haye and Hatton combined to go 6-0 with 3 KO's......our Big 3 of Hopkins, Pavlik and Mosley went 4-2 with 2 KO's.....men lie, women lie, but numbers don't! But its a new year, just let it play itself out before you go and bash the Brits.......so far they got braggin' rights.......until Hatton gets brutally KTFO by Pac and Floyd takes Pac to school.....we got to fall back, but until then...... to the Brits!
          Damn, secondz...you must be wanting them to give you some of that good karma...lol

          I'm talking about P4P right here and right now...

          but if you want me to break it down....and this is historically factual and traditionally recognized....with only a handful of exceptions...considering the amount of fights throughout the last century...

          Their best just can't hang with OUR best....AT their best....

          It's like that....to think otherwise, would be "British".

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by The C.E.O. View Post
            From this very site where you and your cousins live and pollute...

            1) Manny Pacquiao (48-3-2, 36 KO’S)

            2) Joe Calzaghe (46-0, 32 KO)

            3) Bernard Hopkins (49-5-1, 32 KO)

            4) Juan Manuel Marquez (49-4-1, 36 KO)

            5) Shane Mosley (46-5, 39 KO)

            6) Israel Vasquez (43-4, 31 KO)

            7) Ivan Calderon (32-0, 6 KO)

            8) Paul Williams (36-1, 27 KO)

            9) Rafael Marquez (37-5, 33 KO)

            10) Chad Dawson (27-0, 17 KO)
            The Ring P4P (bible of boxing)

            1. Manny Pacquiao

            2. Juan Manuel Marquez

            3. Joe Calzaghe

            4. Bernard Hopkins

            5. Israel Vazquez

            6. Shane Mosley

            7. Rafael Marquez

            8. Ivan Calderon

            9. Ricky Hatton

            10. Celestino Caballero


            BBC Sport P4P

            1. Manny Pacquiao

            2. Joe Calzaghe

            3. Juan Manuel Marquez

            4. Bernard Hopkins

            5. Israel Vazquez

            6. Shane Mosley

            7. Antonio Margarito

            8. Miguel Cotto

            9. Ricky Hatton

            10. Paul Williams




            Hmm, this can be done all day every day mate.

            YOUR PISSING INTO THE WIND.

            Comment


            • #26
              How can you compare yourself to us when you have like 5x the population we do??????

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by pcr405 View Post
                How can you compare yourself to us when you have like 5x the population we do??????
                There IS no comparison....because yeah....you don't measure up....the only reason I started my thread was because one of your peasant brethren had to start with the nationalistic bull****...all the same old lackeys joined in...so I felt like smacking them around a bit....

                but seriously...you all need to start considering territorial expansion...get that larger talent pool...so you can be bigger and better and possibly have a chance at becoming our competition someday....instead of our quirky, little sidekick.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Tengoshi View Post
                  "British" technically refers to anyone English, Welsh, or Scottish, i.e. a resident of Great Britain. The way you use it is as if you believe it means "English"
                  very tru. his a dum ass

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by The C.E.O. View Post
                    There IS no comparison....because yeah....you don't measure up....the only reason I started my thread was because one of your peasant brethren had to start with the nationalistic bull****...all the same old lackeys joined in...so I felt like smacking them around a bit....

                    but seriously...you all need to start considering territorial expansion...get that larger talent pool...so you can be bigger and better and possibly have a chance at becoming our competition someday....instead of our quirky, little sidekick.

                    I believe hitler tried this and it didnt go down to well.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by The C.E.O. View Post
                      There IS no comparison....because yeah....you don't measure up....the only reason I started my thread was because one of your peasant brethren had to start with the nationalistic bull****...all the same old lackeys joined in...so I felt like smacking them around a bit....

                      but seriously...you all need to start considering territorial expansion...get that larger talent pool...so you can be bigger and better and possibly have a chance at becoming our competition someday....instead of our quirky, little sidekick.
                      Thats right, ****ing run *****. Reply to the guy with 66 posts who posted after me.

                      You ain't on my ****ing level, son.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP