Tweet
As much as I dislike Calzaghe's fighting style and demeanor, I think the only one who gets exposed in a Froch fight is Froch. Froch may score a flash knockdown on him in the 1st, but going on recent history, you might as well call the fight over for Froch if that happens. The one thing you can't argue about slappy Joe is his ability to adjust his gameplan mid-fight if things aren't working for him. Kessler is a tougher, and more skilled guy than Froch, and Calzaghe handled him, I don't see a Calzaghe-Froch match going any different.
-
-
how many times have u seen froch fight? i find it hard to believe that you are educated enough to make that judgement!
calzaghe may be a more exprerienced fighter(& arguably more skilled?)
but froch is undoubgtedly the (much)harder hitter and is also a skilled boxer with a proven iron chin!
i have followed the careers of both fighters and am also a fan of both but i think froch would give joe a tougher test than dawson or johnson!
i also think froch could stop kessler late on!!Comment
-
A proven chinOriginally posted by cueball66 View Post
How can his chin be proven when he aint fought nobody? Reid was nearly 40 and he isn't exactly Thomas Hearns when it comes to power.
You are having a laught mate. Froch give Calzaghe a tougher fight than Dawson and Johnson. Dawson has beaten good solid oposition as too has Johnson. Froch has fought Pascal thats it. Froch is record is built on wins over bums on the BBC.Comment
-
Probably...
Right now, Cal-slappy has lost his wits...I believe he will grow his balls back in a few...and ACTUALLY take on Froch, but for now, he's weighing his options. See what the world thinks well enough before he decides. If he gets a good enough pass from the public as a great fighter, he's leave it as it....if there's considered noise that disputes his "awesome" standing.....he might be tempted to take a legacy-augmentating final fight so he can put to bed controversies.
Keep in mind, No one really care for or know Cal-slappy Stateside and worldwide as a matter of fact, most of his fights against weak opposition was in the British isles. Now he wants to be the big man after 2 scraps with old U.S fighters.
He can talk all the **** he wants...but he's **** in my book. Go back to Sardinia, u bullocksComment
-
Originally posted by roujinziro View Postfroch has never fought on the bbc!Originally posted by Dynamite Kid View PostA proven chin
How can his chin be proven when he aint fought nobody? Reid was nearly 40 and he isn't exactly Thomas Hearns when it comes to power.
You are having a laught mate. Froch give Calzaghe a tougher fight than Dawson and Johnson. Dawson has beaten good solid oposition as too has Johnson. Froch has fought Pascal thats it. Froch is record is built on wins over bums on the BBC.
dawson has beat "good solid opposition" LMFAO!!!
he was (very)lucky to get a decision over 40yo johnson (who beat woods once out of 3) and 40yo tarver! no more impressive than froch!
at least froch has heart & personality & fanbase!
a grudge match with froch would be far more interesting than "bad"(lol) chad!
and before u mention it adamek is a chump too! he only beat "uss" cunningham! (chump)Comment
-
Originally posted by cueball66 View Post
We both know Johnson got robbed more than once against Woods and he knocked out Jones and beat Tarver.
Personality
Froch has no personality he just thinks he is better than the rest of us do. There are hardly any Froch fans on this site so, what fanbase. Do mean his mum and his dad and the family.
I see Adamek,Cunningham are chumps. Please lets not go through Froch's piss poor resume.
Bums on BBC is all Froch is good for. Its took Froch ages to step up and he has still only beaten Pascal and he was getting his ears boxed off then.Comment
Comment