Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

They have Calzaghe as ATG but not Mosley? WTF?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by mr.crust View Post
    yeah right,you seem to forget that joe won,a fact all the hopkins fanboys have trouble accepting.and dont even go there with age.hopkins is better than most out there at his age,he is unique in that regard as he showed against pavlik.he thinks bhop is a **** thats why he dont wanna give him ****.

    Yeah right how old are you 12?

    Joe got the decision he did not win.

    What does Hopkins beating Pavlik gotta do with Calzaghe getting the decision over him when Calzaghe himself should not have won the fight.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by mr.crust View Post
      I gave you my explanation now give me yours
      oh you were serious with that "outwork" code word. i thought you had something real.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by andrewcuff View Post
        My point was how can so many boxing fans claim Joe lost in a such a clear cut fashion when Hopkins didn't throw enough punches to win. You can throw less punches, land less punches and land at a lower percentage rate and expect to win.

        It was an close, ugly fight, but Hopkins didn't do enough to convince to judges. Simple.
        compubox seems to be your only resort when defending calzaghe's "victory"
        everyone knows those numbers are pure junk. people on here have actually gone back in slo-mo and counted the number of real landed punches landed by calzaghe and it's pitiful. try watching the fight with your eyes instead of needing compubox as an excuse to say your hometown hero won.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by daggum View Post
          compubox seems to be your only resort when defending calzaghe's "victory"
          everyone knows those numbers are pure junk. people on here have actually gone back in slo-mo and counted the number of real landed punches landed by calzaghe and it's pitiful. try watching the fight with your eyes instead of needing compubox as an excuse to say your hometown hero won.
          Didnt compu box try to tell people hopkins got hit clean over 200 timeS or summin, yet he came out of the fight looking better than JC.

          Comment


          • #85
            people on here have actually gone back in slo-mo and counted the number of real landed punches landed by calzaghe and it's pitiful
            Fine, but go back and look in slo-mo how many punches Hopkins throws and lands. Something tells me its a lot lower than Calzaghe's

            try watching the fight with your eyes instead of needing compubox as an excuse to say your hometown hero won
            I watched the fight. Scored it 115-112 for Calzaghe.

            Comment


            • #86
              Didnt compu box try to tell people hopkins got hit clean over 200 timeS or summin, yet he came out of the fight looking better than JC.
              Very true, but what does that prove? Calzaghe has had a lot of hand trouble over the years. Its not a requirement that you must leave your mark on somebodies face to win a fight.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by andrewcuff View Post
                Fine, but go back and look in slo-mo how many punches Hopkins throws and lands. Something tells me its a lot lower than Calzaghe's


                I watched the fight. Scored it 115-112 for Calzaghe.
                something tells me you need to watch it again and focus on where the punches are landing not just watch the arms moving. moving your arms in a punching/slapping motion doesn't mean you are landing cleanly no matter what the crowd thinks/lampley says.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Dynamite Kid View Post
                  Yes it does, because Tarver and Johnson are better than anybody Kessler has beaten.

                  Dawson will box Calzaghe's ears clean off and Joe knows it.
                  bit hypocritical to rate Dawson's wins over Johnson and Tarver but not Calzaghe's wins over Eubank and Hopkins

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by andrewcuff View Post
                    Very true, but what does that prove? Calzaghe has had a lot of hand trouble over the years. Its not a requirement that you must leave your mark on somebodies face to win a fight.
                    you really believe that pathetic excuse. he NEVER had power. watch his early fights he fights the same exact way. slappy windmilling maniac. all his stoppages the other guy is never hurt even if he gets hit cleanly a bunch of times.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Read my point again: Calzaghe landed more accurate punches than Hopkins did.

                      You keep saying Calzaghe didn't win the fight, but please explain what Hopkins did to be so deserving of victory? Why was he feigning low blows when he was winning so clearly in your eyes?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP