If Pacquaio can't accept 50/50 it shows he doesnt care about legacy.
Collapse
-
-
who on earth were better than Marco, Erik or Juan Manuel?? probably fresher but better??I think the point is that he never fought the best at 122,126,135,147 but that's ok.
He did go 1-1 against JMM. He just never fought guys that were better than Morales and Barrera and less miles on them and were champs of those divisions at the time.
But that turned out to be smart because he made more money the way his promoters did it.
The third Morales was fight was simply for money (Morales had lost to Raheem and had looked like **** ). same with second Barrera fight (had already lost to JMM and was on the decline for a while. Diaz was the champ the weakest champ of 135.
I think his legacy comes from his battles with JMM and the first Barrera fight.
I don't blame him for kicking DLH's ass and making that money. DLH was as usual full of **** and made me lose money on that one.
That was actually the first time I ever rooted against Pac.
removing Morales's name as per PAC legacy is gross disrespect to Erik, on the second fight Erik was winning the fight up to the 5th round, that was the revenge match, Manny's first rematch against anyone...
JMM got his full credit fighting Marco, just a fight before, why PAC cant get his credit rematching barera...
Both Erik & Marco also wanted those rematches and trilogies, it was their right to ask them and it was smart move for them to pass their legacies to the next big thing (PAC) and earn a lot of monies at the same time
Diaz could argue that was the reigning lineal LW champ, he koed the guy who outboxed but got robbed against casamayor...Comment
Comment