age aint nothing but a number yes, but to say casamayor was past his prime aint right because he hadnt lost in years... also, the sta cruz fight was his comeback fight and was rusty ass hell, come on now, u actually believe he was well prepared for that fight?, not take take anything away from sta cruz but get real...
what i was saying in the first place was that i hate people who overrate their favorite fighters win over a shot and past primed opponent LIKE ricky hatton over castillo in which YOU agree he was shot... if u followed Marquez's career u can see hes not the same as he was before..
btw: i mentioned pacquiao/dlh for the fact that pacquiao gets undeserved credit for beating a "SHOT" DLH.. or are you gonna argue with me here too that he isnt?... **** theres some people that say that ANY oscar would of lost to Pacquioa i mean come on! even the oscar that fought Trinidad or Vargas? or Mosley????!? people need a reality check
You forgot to answer why he looked like hell against Katsidis.
Katsidis is not a good fighter, and was winning on two scorecards when Casamayor bombed him out of there when Katsidis lost his mind and started winging punches.
no prob my guy...now if homie just needs some points he can pm me and ill ****s wit him..just ask next time
lol funny doo
Originally posted by DWiens421
You forgot to answer why he looked like hell against Katsidis.
Katsidis is not a good fighter, and was winning on two scorecards when Casamayor bombed him out of there when Katsidis lost his mind and started winging punches.
yooo. did u forget how he dropped him twice in the first round? yes he was losing but not by much, katsidis is young and relentless, casamayor finished the job like a true pro, a shot fighter wouldnt of done that.. come on dude, did morales do that to raheem? oops
Tweet
Comment