Does Erik Morales have higher quality wins then Trinidad?

[goblin]

Does Erik Morales have higher quality wins than Tito Trinidad??
The reason im askin is that throughout the years it at least seems that whenever someone has a top 50 list Trinidad is higher then Morales..Quite honestly im not so sure if he should be or not..I personally think that even though Morales is considered all time great [by everyone] i still say that he's probably the most underated boxer in the last 30yrs..especially achievement wise. Alot of u guys have a better knowledge of both fighters so i wanted to know who has fought and defeated the better fighters?

[Fox McCloud]

Go watch a youtube video called Trinidad's 10 best wins (every video the creator has put out like that is just tight by the way) and Morales's 10 best wins, and boxrec each of their opponents to see what they achieved.

I'm a big Morales fan, and... I definitely think Trinidad has the better resume.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

I like Erik Morales, but man, Tito didn’t just beat people, he ruined careers

[Fox McCloud]

I like Erik Morales, but man, Tito didn’t just beat people, he ruined careers

100% true.

How good was David Reid in the pros? Not very...

How good would he have been had he not fought Trinidad? Well that's up to speculation, but most people seem to think that he was truly the next big thing in boxing.

[goblin]

Go watch a youtube video called Trinidad's 10 best wins (every video the creator has put out like that is just tight by the way) and Morales's 10 best wins, and boxrec each of their opponents to see what they achieved.

I'm a big Morales fan, and... I definitely think Trinidad has the better resume.

yea i'll check it out and see for myself thanks..

[goblin]

I like Erik Morales, but man, Tito didn’t just beat people, he ruined careers

how much did the "hand wraps" stories contribute to tito best wins?
did he do that later in his career? or in his heyday?

[-MAKAVELLI-]

100% true.

How good was David Reid in the pros? Not very...

How good would he have been had he not fought Trinidad? Well that's up to speculation, but most people seem to think that he was truly the next big thing in boxing.

how good would vargas have been? tito was a monster

[-MAKAVELLI-]

how much did the "hand wraps" stories contribute to tito best wins?
did he do that later in his career? or in his heyday?

well, there you go....if that's what you're focusing on then say erik morales...you asked a question, we gave you our opinions and you come back with 'allegations'...you act like he plastered his wraps and took padding out or some ****

[Fox McCloud]

how good would vargas have been? tito was a monster

I was thinking about it. Obviously Trinidad ruined Vargas's chin, but...

I think the real tragedy of Fernando Vargas is that he could not find a style that accented his strengths and minimized his weaknesses (like Jermain Taylor as well). He was too big and slow to be a super slick hit and don't be hit guy, but... he also was a bit too tentative to be a truly wreckless killer.

Even though he won very clearly in the Quartey fight, I still saw that he wasn't exactly thrilled with having to counterpunch.

He just couldn't seem to find what he needed in order to be truly great.

That said, Vargas is obviously a completely badass name to have on your resume, especially an undefeated Vargas.

[goblin]

well, there you go....if that's what you're focusing on then say erik morales...you asked a question, we gave you our opinions and you come back with 'allegations'...you act like he plastered his wraps and took padding out or some ****

woa woa..i aint sayin nothing..and thats why i said specifically "stories"...i just wanted to know if the again STORIES were around throughout his career or the end of his career..thats all man. rumours are just rumours i know that..