Who's the better P4P #1 during their time? Pac or Floyd?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CaRnAgEViOLaToR
    VeNoM
    • Aug 2008
    • 1547
    • 56
    • 6
    • 8,051

    #21
    i like both but i'd have to say manny

    Comment

    • aether
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2006
      • 3337
      • 93
      • 59
      • 3,672

      #22
      Originally posted by 5burowz
      Their resumes are comparable but Manny does have losses while Floyd does not. It's too bad Floyd was too chicken to stick around though.
      i've always believed that nobody knows for sure how good you are until you lose

      Comment

      • FasTHarD
        <div style=
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Nov 2008
        • 14820
        • 337
        • 294
        • 21,796

        #23
        Originally posted by 5burowz
        Their resumes are comparable but Manny does have losses while Floyd does not. It's too bad Floyd was too chicken to stick around though.
        You dont have to be undefeated to become the p4p king or to make p4p top 10... JLC got many loss before he become at p4p top 10... Mayweather is undefeated cuz he ducked his comp....

        Comment

        • Mayfeather
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 642
          • 8
          • 0
          • 7,021

          #24
          This is a very hard question to answer. I mean Pac has done a lot more recently but then you can't knock either of the two fighters opponents. The no losses certainly backs up Mayweathers case but then the fact that Pac has had a crazy year helps him out. Its too hard to call imo

          Comment

          • Del Coqui
            SAN JUAN
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Feb 2005
            • 5407
            • 136
            • 245
            • 12,286

            #25
            American publicists have picked Floyd for the past few years knowing lately his opposition was ****, Pac fought the better opposition, took on bigger challenges, true boxing fans know who the real p4p been all along.

            Comment

            • badboypeenoy
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 3203
              • 54
              • 44
              • 9,669

              #26
              Originally posted by 5burowz
              Their resumes are comparable but Manny does have losses while Floyd does not. It's too bad Floyd was too chicken to stick around though.
              That clown is unbeaten because he's chicken. Guzman and Calzaghe are unbeaten as well and Calzaghe can even argue that his resume is better than Floyd, only difference is that Floyd's American so his being "unbeaten" is given that much weight.

              He is a coward, and his fighting style is cowardly, he serves boxing best retired.

              Comment

              • Mayfeather
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Aug 2008
                • 642
                • 8
                • 0
                • 7,021

                #27
                I dont see how u can't see that Mayweather was awesome though?

                Comment

                • badboypeenoy
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 3203
                  • 54
                  • 44
                  • 9,669

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Mayfeather
                  I dont see how u can't see that Mayweather was awesome though?
                  He's got the skills to be great, but he's got the balls of a wimp, how's that awesome?

                  Comment

                  • Mayfeather
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Aug 2008
                    • 642
                    • 8
                    • 0
                    • 7,021

                    #29
                    He may have the balls of a wimp in your opinion but his boxing skills are awesome. You said earlier he serves boxing better retired, and I don't know how you can justify that?

                    Comment

                    • badboypeenoy
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 3203
                      • 54
                      • 44
                      • 9,669

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Mayfeather
                      He may have the balls of a wimp in your opinion but his boxing skills are awesome. You said earlier he serves boxing better retired, and I don't know how you can justify that?
                      Last thing boxing needs right now is another Mayweather vs. Baldomir or a Mayweather vs. dela Hoya. Those are fights guaranteed to make casual fans turn to MMA.

                      Awesome skills not used awesomely, awesomely stinks.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP