Originally posted by CastorTroy;4542722[B
Is Mike Tyson overrated by boxing fans?
Collapse
-
I still can't see Tyson being as effective in his 30's. All those short explosive in your face fighters had short but devastating careers. Tyson had a great deal of skill but also relied on his supernatural athletic gifts, the fact that he peaked early also contributes to this.
The kid was 200 lbs at 14, he hit his prime in his early 20's. In his prime however, I give him a good shot and wiping out any ATG with the kind of speed and power he had.
However, for a long term career like other greats, I can't see this happening for Tyson, he wouldn't be the same even in his 30's if he had been mentally prepared. Tyson was still the quickest heavyweight even when he fought Lewis, but it didn't matter at that point - he could only keep it up for the first round.
He just had his stint, wiped out everyone in his Prime, destroyed Holmes, destroyed Spinks and probably could have beaten Holyfield if his trainers had any sense or plan B. But in terms of a long lasting Career, I don't see that. Other fighters when they get old can rely on other things, Foreman (power and strength), toughness and gameplans (Ali) boxing fundamentals and timing/clinching (Hopkins)..Tyson is 5'11 with a short reach, the only thing he can do is come forward and blast away, you can only do that for so long and definently not when you are in you're 30's and 40's.Comment
-
I can't help but laugh when casual fans ask me if he's a top 10 heavyweight all time. You gotta be kidding to rate Tyson among the 10 best heavies ever.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Comment