Why boxing and UFC should not be compared

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FreshPrince
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 1929
    • 70
    • 0
    • 8,282

    #11
    I like them both. I box in the ams and recently I started Brazilian Jiu Jitsu so I can respect the ground game/submissions a little more. I think why some boxing fans aren't into mma as much as guys from the other martial arts is that you get to see world class wrestling and jiu-jitsu... When boxing fans see wrestlers try to stand up and punch they're like wtf is this ****, they suck. The future generation of mma stand-up will better, but boxing is still light years ahead when you're talking about throwing the hands.
    ________
    Vaporizer
    Last edited by FreshPrince; 01-18-2011, 07:18 AM.

    Comment

    • MOREBASS
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2006
      • 1416
      • 58
      • 30
      • 7,933

      #12
      They shouldn't be compared because they are two different sports.


      The premises are similar.


      Boxing is like the slam dunk contest.

      MMA is the actual game.


      Not to take anything away from boxing, as boxing can be just as technical as any aspect of MMA. Its just one element of fighting, that MMA encompasses.

      Comment

      • FreshPrince
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2008
        • 1929
        • 70
        • 0
        • 8,282

        #13
        Originally posted by MOREBASS
        They shouldn't be compared because they are two different sports.


        The premises are similar.


        Boxing is like the slam dunk contest.

        MMA is the actual game.



        Not to take anything away from boxing, as boxing can be just as technical as any aspect of MMA. Its just one element of fighting, that MMA encompasses.
        Wow, that's actually the best comparison of the two I've heard. I like that analogy.
        ________
        R25
        ________
        ******* young
        Last edited by FreshPrince; 03-28-2011, 02:32 PM.

        Comment

        • Pullcounter
          no guts no glory
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2004
          • 42582
          • 549
          • 191
          • 49,739

          #14
          Originally posted by MOREBASS
          They shouldn't be compared because they are two different sports.


          The premises are similar.


          Boxing is like the slam dunk contest.

          MMA is the actual game.


          Not to take anything away from boxing, as boxing can be just as technical as any aspect of MMA. Its just one element of fighting, that MMA encompasses.
          boxing is like football... mma is like combining football, basketball, and baseball into one sport.

          Comment

          • SonOfCuba
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2008
            • 2340
            • 156
            • 9
            • 9,064

            #15
            boxing is more than a sport, thats like trying to compare tennis to track and field, see one is just a sport... the other is a way of life.

            Comment

            • Tysonisgod
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Oct 2003
              • 1430
              • 59
              • 0
              • 7,670

              #16
              boxing is more than a sport, thats like trying to compare tennis to track and field, see one is just a sport... the other is a way of life.
              Both is a way of life, and i hope you werent tryin to downplay MMA as just the type of sport were you dont have to be in the best shape to do it, cos youd be very wrong, without the handfull of fighters that look like they belong in a hotdog eating contest most MMA fighters have some amazing bodys which cant be said for alot of boxers, UFC even have a heavyweight limit of 265, something boxing should have brought into play along time ago, then maybe the heavys wouldnt be looked at like a waste of someones spunk.
              The point is, MMA and boxing is 2 different sports, one wants to see who the better fighter is, and one wants to see who the better boxer is, theres lots of silly ways to look at both sides.... mma is for blood thursty dumb guys, boxing is for guys who wanna fight, but wanna take out everythin else and just punch each other in certin parts,

              WHO GIVES A **** REALLY MMA rocks, boxing rocks, both have there good fighters, both have **** fighters, both make money, both lose out on money, both will survive, neither will ever get put out by the other

              Comment

              • pistol whip
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2008
                • 8645
                • 255
                • 4
                • 15,040

                #17
                Originally posted by cosmichorn
                UFC is relatively new, half the people in the UK dont even know UFC exists, let alone know champions in divisions.

                Michael Bisping a UFC Middleweight was voted most popular fighter in the UK so what the **** are you talking about.

                Ricky hatton was second and Joe C third.

                Comment

                • SLASHEh
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 149
                  • 7
                  • 13
                  • 6,413

                  #18
                  i suppose theres always going to be a market for pro wrestling, as its just wrestling theatre. MMA and Boxing are real and I don't see why they can't co-exist?

                  I enjoy watching both, i think both sports have good and bad points and i look forward to BIG ufc bouts almost as much as i look forward to BIG boxing bouts.

                  Fanatical fans are the ones that want one or the other to die out but casual fans just want to see some action

                  Comment

                  • Kakutogi-Gumi
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2007
                    • 2793
                    • 90
                    • 7
                    • 9,142

                    #19
                    Originally posted by goblin
                    Im telling you right now UFC will NEVER replace WWE...ever..u can forget about it..WWE is f***** HUGE outside of america and hell even IN america it may not be like in the late nineties or early 2000 when Stone Cold and Rock dominated but its still HUGE. These *******s make MAD money from merchandising and ticket sales, payperview rev etc..again..even though its not as big as before The WWE is simply a Merchandising Juggernaut and its not going ANYwhere anytime soon..All they do is touring man over and over and over..it aint going nowhere.
                    Of course not. There will be drastic changes though. Because they changed their "genre" to Entertainment, they won't be competing with sport related PPV next year. The quality of fans and athletics will change drasticly as well. The median will skew closer to kids while talent with and athletic talent will fall to nill.

                    It'll turn cartoon once Real Pro Wrestling starts making it's return.

                    Comment

                    • -Antonio-
                      -Antonio-
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2005
                      • 24259
                      • 629
                      • 164
                      • 38,153

                      #20
                      Wrestling will always have it's audience. Just like boxing.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP