Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who do you Respect as P4P Best Fighter Pacquiao or Floyd?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by MakeDamnSure View Post
    Change Morales, Barrera, Marquez and DLH to Guzman, Valero and Diaz on his resume, Pac wouldn't even be a top 10 P4P.. You're a comedian.. In short a Sore Loser.. Barrera was the lineal champ, Marquez was the lineal champ, Valero and Guzman didn't do **** to earn a shot like Cotto and Margarito did. You're a sore loser.. A big time crybaby.!
    First of all i think you have alot of problems reading and comprehending. Second of all, i would never, ever discredit pacs p4p status as he is the rightful owner of the top spot without a doubt. Third of all if you read my post, i say specificly that he left 2 divisions without truely cleaning them out, am i ok with it? Yes. Does it leave questionmarks, in many ways yes. Barrera was the lineal champ at 126, pac was definately the top dog there. At 130, the marquez fights were very close, but pac was still linear champ after beating marquez in disuputed fashion. What im saying is, after he beat those mexican legends, i wish he would have fought more actual in their prime contenders within the 130/135 division as opposed to taking on david diaz and the like. I am not suggesting pac never should have fought morales/barrera/marquez, im saying i wish he would have done a bit more after in terms of clearing the division of guys who could actually beat him.

    How am i a sore loser? Im not mexican. I dont hate pacman and i never implied any of the former.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by El Jesus View Post
      First of all i think you have alot of problems reading and comprehending. Second of all, i would never, ever discredit pacs p4p status as he is the rightful owner of the top spot without a doubt. Third of all if you read my post, i say specificly that he left 2 divisions without truely cleaning them out, am i ok with it? Yes. Does it leave questionmarks, in many ways yes. Barrera was the lineal champ at 126, pac was definately the top dog there. At 130, the marquez fights were very close, but pac was still linear champ after beating marquez in disuputed fashion. What im saying is, after he beat those mexican legends, i wish he would have fought more actual in their prime contenders within the 130/135 division as opposed to taking on david diaz and the like. I am not suggesting pac never should have fought morales/barrera/marquez, im saying i wish he would have done a bit more after in terms of clearing the division of guys who could actually beat him.

      How am i a sore loser? Im not mexican. I dont hate pacman and i never implied any of the former.
      Fighting DLH at 147 > Fighting Campbell or Tricycle Valero.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by MakeDamnSure View Post
        Fighting DLH at 147 > Fighting Campbell or Tricycle Valero.
        Fighting Oscar at Jr Mw >> Any WW

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Flawless. View Post
          Fighting Oscar at Jr Mw >> Any WW
          Mayweather should be great then, let's all bow down.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by badboypeenoy View Post
            Mayweather should be great then, let's all bow down.
            LOL He is already great, you from Oz. Where in Oz, Melb??

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Flawless. View Post
              Fighting Oscar at Jr Mw >> Any WW
              in terms of money? yes! any other reason, that is absolute bull****!

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Flawless. View Post
                LOL He is already great, you from Oz. Where in Oz, Melb??
                I don't think he's great, he's boring. A P4P fighter being booed by the audience? Great my ass.

                Last edited by badboypeenoy; 12-17-2008, 08:14 AM.

                Comment


                • #48
                  oh and just to stay on topic here, i will have to go with Pac-Man! he is still active, and the current pound for pound...i respect his spot at the top.

                  floyd is retired...i respected his spot when he still was fighting, but the P4P can not be put on hold for any fighter. even floyd(some of you cats need to learn that).

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by MakeDamnSure View Post
                    Who do you respect when they were P4P King Pacquiao or FLoyd?
                    If you really want to know, next time call him Mayweather. You immediately show that you're biased when you say Gayweather and it makes me not respect you making this thread. Valid question, just don't act like an idiot. Changing the guys name to Gayweather does nothing but make you look like a dumb fan.

                    By the way, I do respect Pac as the P4P right now, however if Floyd came back I would consider him the man to beat. I don't think anyone would argue against that.

                    I saw some guy yesterday say that if Floyd comes back to fight Pac, he would see Mayweather as the large betting underdog. Anyone who wants to take that bet with me at those odds, I'd welcome it.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by HandSpeed303 View Post
                      in terms of money? yes! any other reason, that is absolute bull****!
                      Oscar being the number one Jr MW at the time also he had a title combined with the fact that would champion in 5 weight classes

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP