First of all i think you have alot of problems reading and comprehending. Second of all, i would never, ever discredit pacs p4p status as he is the rightful owner of the top spot without a doubt. Third of all if you read my post, i say specificly that he left 2 divisions without truely cleaning them out, am i ok with it? Yes. Does it leave questionmarks, in many ways yes. Barrera was the lineal champ at 126, pac was definately the top dog there. At 130, the marquez fights were very close, but pac was still linear champ after beating marquez in disuputed fashion. What im saying is, after he beat those mexican legends, i wish he would have fought more actual in their prime contenders within the 130/135 division as opposed to taking on david diaz and the like. I am not suggesting pac never should have fought morales/barrera/marquez, im saying i wish he would have done a bit more after in terms of clearing the division of guys who could actually beat him.
How am i a sore loser? Im not mexican. I dont hate pacman and i never implied any of the former.
How am i a sore loser? Im not mexican. I dont hate pacman and i never implied any of the former.
Comment