Klits are overrated, here is my take...

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Underdog82
    Banned
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jun 2007
    • 953
    • 43
    • 0
    • 1,116

    #31
    Originally posted by Naps
    Ok, I made this post in another thread, but thought it was worth a thread.

    The Klits are a hypedob, a PR machine. They might me really good, but we have no evidence of that yet.

    I'm genuinely do not understand all the Klit praise.

    Wlad.

    Has never fought anyone decent EVER. He has been beaten by some terrible fighters, and 10 years ago he wouldn't even be a top 5 heavy.

    Most recent evidence: Embarrasing display towards the end of the 3rd round against Rahman.

    Vitali

    Only fought one decent fighter ever. A shot Lewis, and he still got TKO'd.

    Neither of these guys have doen ANYTHING to back up the praise they get. Big deal, they dominate the Heavies right now. One of my mates who is TERRIBLE and fat is ranked in the top 50 heavies, and I reckon I could beat him even!!

    Most recent evidence: Won a world title.........of one of the worst Champions (any weight) in history.

    The division is wank, and the Klits have NOTHING on their resumes.

    Hypejob Klits, only get coverage cos they are tall, white, European, and brothers. It's the quirkiness factor which makes them stars. Someone tell me who either of them have beat that justifies their reputation...
    __________________

    According to you, no boxer is decent unless they are number 1. You're a ****ing idiot. Shut up.

    Comment

    • Pullcounter
      no guts no glory
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2004
      • 42582
      • 549
      • 191
      • 49,739

      #32
      Originally posted by GodzHand
      I agree that Wlad's been fighting a boring fight, but like I said, his opponents can't get him to fight differently because they get dominated by his superior boxing skills. It's somewhat his fault, true, but when it comes down to it, a boring, tactical W is more important than a fight-of-the-year worthy L
      why be so tactical when the division is such garbage

      Comment

      • MetalVomit
        I love *****, Amigo.
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Sep 2004
        • 12193
        • 817
        • 1,208
        • 22,041

        #33
        Originally posted by Pullcounter
        why be so tactical when the division is such garbage
        Because if you are absolutely dominating by being tactical, AND still KOing guys, why not?

        Comment

        • PaiidINFULLent.
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 158
          • 4
          • 0
          • 6,517

          #34
          Like it or not (I'm not a fan), but Wlad is the most dominate heavyweight in this era. Granted the competition was wack but I doubt anyone can **** with thiss dude, you can't blame him for the lack of a real contender. Vitali could of been special but his injury problems held him back.I wish Lennox would've stuck around a little bit longer but I understand him wanting to retire at the top with his future investments intact.

          Comment

          • Naps
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 5660
            • 339
            • 415
            • 15,109

            #35
            Originally posted by Underdog82
            According to you, no boxer is decent unless they are number 1. You're a ****ing idiot. Shut up.

            If anyone needs the bottle it's you. I laid out my argument, and explained my opinion clearly. If you disagree then fine, but at least try and discuss it.

            You're a ****ing idiot maked you look unintelligent, and like you don't have an answer to me.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP