POLL: Rate Floyd Mayweather Jr's resume (1-10)

[larryx]

Srl fought the better opposition, so I think my opinion has alot of fact to back it up. And Espn also rates Srl a **** lot higher then they do floyd. I guess my opinion is pretty popular even with the experts.

but why did you even bring him up?????you had to go to another era to say.."hey he can beat floyd"????

[Naz Fan]

Great resume...but it's only an 8.

To make it a 9 he should have fought Cotto, Margarito and Williams.

10/10 resume's just dont happen...

[ACHlLLES]

but why did you even bring him up?????you had to go to another era to say.."hey he can beat floyd"????

I think Manny has a good chance too, and even cotto. That is why I'd make Mayweather a 10 on my list if he came out of retirement and was able to beat them both. I know how good manny and cotto are so it would impress me alot even if I don't like floyd at all since he bores the **** out of me and SRL's workwrate is so much more impressive.

[-Swizzy-]

SRL would beat the **** out of Floyd

this is a hate post and nothing more.

this thread is about Floyd's resume, not who could beat him.

[MANGLER]

7, above average but could be better.

[Golden Boy 360]

Great resume...but it's only an 8.

To make it a 9 he should have fought Cotto, Margarito and Williams.

10/10 resume's just dont happen...

de la hoyas resume is a 10/10

[FeFist]

I voted 9 but I should have given him an 8. I was a little bias originally. Anyway say what you will he cleaned out his original division.

[FeFist]

de la hoyas resume is a 10/10

No it isn't. Fighting big names and losing doesn't count.

Whitaker was cheated, Chavez was aged.

[larryx]

damn xcract is a hater...he voted 1..guess you have to be mexican to be a good fighter..lmfao

[ACHlLLES]

No it isn't. Fighting big names and losing doesn't count.

Whitaker was cheated, Chavez was aged.

You made him cry