Joe Calzaghe is P4P #1

[2501]

ffs what **** has resume gotto do with a pvp list god sakes pvp is all about skills pound for pound not a boxers resume calzaghe pvp is up there no doubt resumewise no simple.

****, well in that case, Marquez>Calzaghe all day baby.

[dde91]

Calzaghe wasn't in his prime either when he fought Hopkins and Jones.

So you find it unacceptable for two fighters past their prime to face each other (Cal vs Hopkins/Jones), but you think it's perfectly alright for a fighter past their prime, looking to retire (Calzaghe) to fight a young up and comer 10 years their junior (Dawson)?

You're a hypocrite.

Hopkins was 36 when he fought a 28 year old trinidad. Hopkins fought pavlik when he is 43. He fought Joe at 43. Hopkins is a past his prime way more then Cal-slappy, and still beat him in REAL boxing fans books.

So just because He is 36 he shouldn't fight Dawson?

And he chose to come to America and fight hopkins, and Jones after their primes when he could have came over 3-5 years ago when they were 1,2, p4p. Calzaghe shouldn't even be in the top 5 P4P with Pac, Marquez, Margarito, Williams, etc.

He said the Jones fight was the best fight of his career. That is pathetic because Jones Is WAY past his prime, SinCE he got knocked out cold. He is a great just because he beat a 2008 version of JOnes. He isn't a ATG or a HoF in my book. His so called BEST WIN doesn't compare to any other greats Best Win. And thats straight up.

[_Hunter_]

hehehe carry on being a jealous hater of Americans. 10 to 1 you are a fat piece of ****.

you ****** yank, dont eat your big mac near the keyboard. you fat little tard

[them_apples]

hehe, carry on following me little jizzpac.

Chris john should be p4p no.2 the cully Nad' undefeated!! fighting nobodies and winning robberies!!! he should wait till Pacquiao is 40 years old and battered..then come over and kill the legends!!

[mitch12]

WHAT does this have to do with resume being unimportant in p4p status...

You have to be beating valid names in the sport to become #1

if Pacman wasnt beating Morales, Barrera, Oscar, Diaz, etc etc he woulnt be #1 either

im not on about resumes im on about boxing skills two different things

[The Hammer]

I rate Pacquiao as #1, but you're entitled to your opinion.

I think Joe is very underrated by Americans and is one of the 2 or 3 best of the past decade 1999-2008.

[dde91]

WHAT does this have to do with resume being unimportant in p4p status...

You have to be beating valid names in the sport to become #1

if Pacman wasnt beating Morales, Barrera, Oscar, Diaz, etc etc he woulnt be #1 either

Dont forget Marquez too.. WHo i think should be ahead of Calzaghe on the P4P

[horge]

ok pvp has nothing to do with resume

Sure, P4P is really about current ability rather than credentials.

However...
The only way we can monitor a fighter's current ability is by observing
how he performs, when tested to his limits by good competition.

Now, if all a fighter ever faces are tomato cans and worn-out boxers,
the sort that he can volume-slap to a decision win, then no one can really
say that he's so good. In fact, ducking the best opposition actually suggests
the fighter can't match up, which discourages ranking him high on any
P4P list.

That clear enough for you?


h.

[THE REED]

im not on about resumes im on about boxing skills two different things

no, your ON about p4p status, and that has to do with resume...

[dde91]

well your the fool for not mentioning calzaghes ****ed up hands these days

He hands are **cked up because he doesn't know how to punch.