Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Still Immune To The "Pac-Man" Fever

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Manny Pacquiao isn't sitting infront of a computer waiting for your opinion on what he has done. The fact of the matter is he has more money than you, he is more popular, he gets more girls, hes got a life, hes a pro-athlete, hes the best at what he does. Stop hating on Pac.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by flem1 View Post
      Man that's harsh. Admit it Mr. Author, you just can't accept the fact you were wrong in the fight. Lay down your pride
      He did say he was wrong, as was almost everyone else - didn't you read his post????

      Comment


      • #13
        what a ***ing hater. is not "fever" is reality.pacquiao has proven to be THE best of this generation.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by The_Bull View Post
          Manny Pacquiao isn't sitting infront of a computer waiting for your opinion on what he has done...Stop hating on Pac.
          The OP made it obvious that he admires Pacquiao, you're just paranoid if you think he hates him. Try reading his post properly. As for the idea that no-one has a right to have an opinion about boxing (apart from you presumably), that sucks.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Dave Rado View Post
            The OP made it obvious that he admires Pacquiao, you're just paranoid if you think he hates him. Try reading his post properly. As for the idea that no-one has a right to have an opinion about boxing (apart from you presumably), that sucks.
            Okay Dave Rado.

            Comment


            • #16
              Pacquiao may not beat any top WW. But he is the best right know. Pacquiao is #1 P4P inside and outside the ring. That guy is something to admire!!!!!!!!!

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Dave Rado View Post
                That was at a much lighter weight. The OP said Pacquiao fought brilliantly against De La Hoya, he just said the comparisons people are making with people like Henry Armstrong are wrong. Armstrong was undisputed champion at three weights simultaneously, whereas Pacquiao gave up his super-featherweight title and hasn't won any undisputed weight championships since.
                that 130 undisputed title was won 8 months ago! lol

                yeah he hasn't done much in 8 months.

                armstrong was an extraordinary case.

                he went from 126 to 147 to 135 to win all 3 lineal belts.

                that'd be like beating barrera at 126 , floyd at 147 and casamayor at 135.

                that's not possible in the modern era.

                nowadays 147 guys are the size of light heavyweights during armstrong's days.

                plus how many lineal champions are there?

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post

                  He still holds zero legitimate titles in any weight class… not three, as Armstrong did.

                  Yeah all he did was fight on 3 different weight divisions this year (2008) and won all of them. Capturing a lineal and two alphabelt belts in the process. The welterweight fight didn't have any belts.....it was for show. A superfight, a mega event, an entertainment value......a money fight.

                  I'm just happy, we didn't have to debate if Pacquiao needed to lose his P4P#1 status had Oscar defeated him.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    what?? you must've lo0se millions betting on the bigger man.. haha.. and nate?? why is he even mentioned in this article?? he's not the best lightwt, i believe its jmm... and floyd? well there's a big difference between TKO & SPLIT DECISION...

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Dave Rado View Post
                      He did say he was wrong, as was almost everyone else - didn't you read his post????
                      My bad, LOL! I just didn't like the tone of his article. He must have been indulging himself with sour g****s..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP