This Dawson is more proven than Kessler rubbish

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dan...
    Fredette About It
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 7675
    • 454
    • 951
    • 19,200

    #21
    Dawson is more proven than Kessler. Kessler's best win is Anthony Mundine. Dawson has beaten several guys above that level - Harding, Johnson, Adamek, Tarver. It really isn't open for debate.

    Comment

    • Weebler I
      El Weeblerito I
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 31092
      • 1,459
      • 1,648
      • 54,550

      #22
      Calzaghe should just invite Dawson to Wales and beat his ass

      Comment

      • Chunk..
        Shot To ****!
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 32228
        • 687
        • 163
        • 47,451

        #23
        Originally posted by Testdead
        Sorry the thread does say "tested" you do understand that? Kessler is clearly the more "tested" of the two.

        Where are you from, ****** town?
        Kessler got outclassed by Calzaghe and beat Mundine and Beyer who are ****e!. I'll give you Andrade.

        Kessler ain't done ****! and Dawson is still green and beat the better competition.

        Thanks!

        Comment

        • Dan...
          Fredette About It
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 7675
          • 454
          • 951
          • 19,200

          #24
          Originally posted by Mozza
          I think Tarver is overrated and the fight with Johnson is highly contentious.
          LOL. You gotta be p4p the most biased poster on these boards bro.

          Comment

          • Mozza
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2006
            • 3802
            • 233
            • 174
            • 12,277

            #25
            Originally posted by Flawless 2
            LOL Look at Tunney thread and Calzaghe fans who agree with him

            Associated Press, Yahoo, and ESPN scored the bout 114-113 for Hopkins. This fight was very close the deciison could have gone Hopkins way, it was scored a SD don't forget. Calzaghe said he was hurt against Hopkins.
            I don't give a **** if Hopkins hurt him, it's a boxing match for Christ's sake, of course people are going to get hurt. Scoring the fight 114-113 for Hopkins means giving every single close round to him which proves to me that they are going out of their way to score for him.

            Comment

            • Mozza
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2006
              • 3802
              • 233
              • 174
              • 12,277

              #26
              Originally posted by danc1984
              LOL. You gotta be p4p the most biased poster on these boards bro.
              Because I don't like Tarver and think Johnson and Dawson was a close fight? Please explain.

              Comment

              • IMDAZED
                Fair but Firm
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2006
                • 42644
                • 1,134
                • 1,770
                • 67,152

                #27
                Originally posted by Testdead
                Being honest i dont see that Dawson is more proven than Kessler. Kessler went to Australia to beat Mundene he also beat Beyer and schooled Andrade not forgetting he went to Wales and fought infront of 55,000 he has also had 40 fights.

                Dawson has has 27 fights never left the States and hold wins over Tarver and a disputed one over Johnson who lost clearly to Clinton Woods.

                Dont see it, Kessler is more "proven" he has also won more titles.
                How are any of those guys better than Tomasz Adamek, Antonio Tarver or Glen Johnson?

                Comment

                • Flawless 2
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 3596
                  • 113
                  • 77
                  • 4,134

                  #28
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  How are any of those guys better than Tomasz Adamek, Antonio Tarver or Glen Johnson?
                  He fought in Autralia, they have dingos

                  Comment

                  • Jim Jeffries
                    rugged individualist
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 20741
                    • 1,376
                    • 2,868
                    • 54,838

                    #29
                    Originally posted by danc1984
                    Dawson is more proven than Kessler. Kessler's best win is Anthony Mundine. Dawson has beaten several guys above that level - Harding, Johnson, Adamek, Tarver. It really isn't open for debate.
                    I think Dawson is more proven as well. But 40 year olds Tarver and Johnson, one of whom he really lost to, a sliding Harding in the last fight of his career and a still unproven Ademek aren't really the stuff of legends either.

                    Comment

                    • Dan...
                      Fredette About It
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 7675
                      • 454
                      • 951
                      • 19,200

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Jim Jeffries
                      I think Dawson is more proven as well. But 40 year olds Tarver and Johnson, one of whom he really lost to, a sliding Harding in the last fight of his career and a still unproven Ademek aren't really the stuff of legends either.
                      Maybe so, but they are still well above the level of Anthony Mundine IMO.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP