Dawson is more proven than Kessler. Kessler's best win is Anthony Mundine. Dawson has beaten several guys above that level - Harding, Johnson, Adamek, Tarver. It really isn't open for debate.
This Dawson is more proven than Kessler rubbish
Collapse
-
Kessler got outclassed by Calzaghe and beat Mundine and Beyer who are ****e!. I'll give you Andrade.
Kessler ain't done ****! and Dawson is still green and beat the better competition.
Thanks!Comment
-
I don't give a **** if Hopkins hurt him, it's a boxing match for Christ's sake, of course people are going to get hurt. Scoring the fight 114-113 for Hopkins means giving every single close round to him which proves to me that they are going out of their way to score for him.LOL Look at Tunney thread and Calzaghe fans who agree with him
Associated Press, Yahoo, and ESPN scored the bout 114-113 for Hopkins. This fight was very close the deciison could have gone Hopkins way, it was scored a SD don't forget. Calzaghe said he was hurt against Hopkins.Comment
-
How are any of those guys better than Tomasz Adamek, Antonio Tarver or Glen Johnson?Being honest i dont see that Dawson is more proven than Kessler. Kessler went to Australia to beat Mundene he also beat Beyer and schooled Andrade not forgetting he went to Wales and fought infront of 55,000 he has also had 40 fights.
Dawson has has 27 fights never left the States and hold wins over Tarver and a disputed one over Johnson who lost clearly to Clinton Woods.
Dont see it, Kessler is more "proven" he has also won more titles.Comment
-
Comment
-
I think Dawson is more proven as well. But 40 year olds Tarver and Johnson, one of whom he really lost to, a sliding Harding in the last fight of his career and a still unproven Ademek aren't really the stuff of legends either.Comment
-
Maybe so, but they are still well above the level of Anthony Mundine IMO.Comment
Comment