JC is great because noone has been able to expose or beat him. BH couldnt yet he could beat Pavlik and just about everyone else, including Tarver. But not JC! WHy is that? Ask yourself why dude?
Tarver and Johnson also lost many fights against average guys and that is why you cant put them in the same bracket as JC. They havent been unbeaten since 17 years old. They havent gone unbeaten as a Pro. Its not just judged on beating an old RJJ. JC was great before he beat RJJ and BH.
Do you need me to tell you the obvious?
Tarver and Johnson also lost many fights against average guys and that is why you cant put them in the same bracket as JC. They havent been unbeaten since 17 years old. They havent gone unbeaten as a Pro. Its not just judged on beating an old RJJ. JC was great before he beat RJJ and BH.
Do you need me to tell you the obvious?
I find it highly ammusing that people rate Calslappy for his recent non-acheivements and would like to see someone justify the bull**** hype. Please do....
lol
Comment