People who hate the abc's but will quickly acknowlege the WBO, wtf?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Spirit
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • May 2007
    • 994
    • 60
    • 124
    • 7,198

    #21
    Moreso than the WBC or the WBA. The WBC making numerous exceptions for champions not to fight the fighters that actually deserve a shot and their rankings are often ridiculous. The WBA is about as corrupt as it gets having multiple champions in the same divisions. Today's WBO champions often are the true champions of the division or a competitive #2. Calzaghe was, Pavlik is, Campbell is, Klitschko is. Competitive #2s are fighters like Williams, Holt and Dzinziruk.

    Comment

    • KnockoutTheFat
      Beer Spokesman
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2006
      • 5130
      • 220
      • 221
      • 12,177

      #22
      I never had the belt. Therefore, it's ****.

      But seriously, I think WBO got on par with the other sanctioning orgs when Wlad became their champion.

      Comment

      • Liaison
        Stripper / Whore
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Oct 2006
        • 2006
        • 110
        • 21
        • 8,834

        #23
        Yeah, Warren has his hand in there but you now, IBF played to Kings tune, likewise with the WBC, Kohl fiddles with the WBA and so on.

        All as bad as each other, but money talks so whatever…

        Comment

        • ferocity
          NOV. 3, NEW CHAMPION
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Feb 2006
          • 15629
          • 313
          • 257
          • 23,031

          #24
          If Hbo and Showtime were smart they'd make there own belt. In time they or one or the other would own boxing.

          Comment

          • sparked_85
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2007
            • 6036
            • 158
            • 97
            • 12,597

            #25
            I don't think the WBO is the worst strap of the 4, the WBA is a shocker.

            Comment

            • Mr. Ryan
              Guest
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2004
              • 23429
              • 1,301
              • 1,089
              • 29,664

              #26
              Originally posted by ferocity
              You complain about the alpahbet belts. How we dont need them and instead of having 3 recognizable belts people like to talk about the WBO as if its a legit title. I guess i must be in denial the WBO is just as legit as the WBC, IBF and WBA?
              Margarito was never a world champion until recently, got it.

              Comment

              • squealpiggy
                Stritctly UG's friend
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2007
                • 28896
                • 2,028
                • 1,603
                • 66,600

                #27
                It's as legit as the others and despite idiotic errors (ranking a dead guy for example) it has steered clearer of absurd politics than the others who seem to trade on their age to make preposterous declarations and decisions. Examples:

                WBA has the champ, unified champ, the super champ, the super duper champ and the super duper...ooper champ. What the fuck is that about?

                the IBF sanctioned the Mayweather Judah fight despite the fact that Judah had just got his ass handed to him by Carlos Baldomir in a title fight. Sure he didn't pay your fees. But that doesn't mean that Judah didn't lose a title fight! Judah should have been stripped of the title after losing. Farce.

                The WBC is ridiculous with its nonsense approach to ranking and its random rule changes. Emeritus champ? Emeritus shut the fuck up.

                Comment

                • Chups
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2004
                  • 18400
                  • 1,835
                  • 1,281
                  • 52,879

                  #28
                  Wether we like it or not...those 4 belts are legit. We only wish that they did not exist coz they are corrupt. In a perfect world, the RING belt should only be the one recognized. It has the better rules.

                  Comment

                  • roundingace
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 1288
                    • 31
                    • 0
                    • 7,682

                    #29
                    One sanctioning body, one champion - period. Force the divisions to compete for the lone belt and have only one true champion per division.

                    Comment

                    • MANGLER
                      Sex Tape Flop Artist
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 30142
                      • 1,705
                      • 2,355
                      • 46,598

                      #30
                      They are all just different colored belts wit different letters on em. The man makes the belt he wears, not vice versa.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP