You complain about the alpahbet belts. How we dont need them and instead of having 3 recognizable belts people like to talk about the WBO as if its a legit title. I guess i must be in denial the WBO is just as legit as the WBC, IBF and WBA?
People who hate the abc's but will quickly acknowlege the WBO, wtf?
Collapse
-
-
Some respectable fighters have held a WBO belt. Hearns, for starters. No need to mention JC. Pavlik, too.
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3Comment
-
WBO is awful. Almost as bad as the WBA. They never enforced the mandatory for Naseem Hamed so he wouldn't have to fight JMM, take step aside bets from Frank Warren (Warren paid off the WBO so that Arthur would get the belt and Guzman would be ranked 1 at lightweight insted), and they rank dead people....Comment
-
-
They're all corrupt and lecherous, sucking the lifeblood out of the sport. The only difference between the WBO and the rest is it's newer and less recognised. As I type, the WBA currently has three super-flyweight world champions. The WBC has been thick with King and Sulaiman for years. What kind of credibility do any of them have?Comment

Comment