A "W" for Roy Jones Jr. is Great, where a "W" for Joe Calzaghe is good...but neither

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pullcounter
    no guts no glory
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2004
    • 42582
    • 549
    • 191
    • 49,739

    #31
    Originally posted by The Hulk
    Calzaghe has had a better career than Jones purely due to his consistancy.
    calz and jone were both fairly consistent fighting bums that much i can agree.

    Jones in his prime was better but who did he prove it against?
    Hopkins and J. Toney to name 2.

    Comment

    • ACHlLLES
      watch ur mouth
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 8398
      • 236
      • 359
      • 15,211

      #32
      Originally posted by The Hulk
      Disagree? Give me names of anyone they ducked.
      I'm a Calzaghe fan but I feel like I know Calzaghe well and I do feel like he ducked Glenn Johnson, twice to be specific. And I believe frank warren had to pay Glenn Johnson for Calzaghe not wanting to fight Johnson. But that is not a real shocker, most people duck johnson because they know how tough he is. Dawson will never ever take a rematch against Johnson. Mark my words.

      Comment

      • toluco
        Banned
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 717
        • 22
        • 2
        • 849

        #33
        Originally posted by Pullcounter
        if calz KOs jones he shouldn't get any credit. rjj is shot and calz should be able to dominate and KO jones.
        see thats why calzaghe doesnt want to keep fighting everyone discredits his wins
        if he dominated pavlik everyone would say palik was too green roy jones jr is shot
        rematch with hopkins is a joke because hopkins is too old
        dawson is too green
        there is no opponent that can match the greatness of calzaghe thats why the best decision is to retire

        Comment

        • BennyST
          Shhhh...
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2007
          • 9263
          • 1,036
          • 500
          • 21,301

          #34
          Originally posted by Silencers
          I meant right now I don't understand how he can be considered better than the majority, I meant where after his 3 losses back to back has he proven that he is better than the majority right now, I know he's better than the majority prime for prime but is he better than the majority today? I don't know because he hasn't proven it to me with the 3 wins he has had since his third fight with Tarver.
          I thought you were talking about Blow, not Jones. My bad.

          Comment

          • Silencers
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2006
            • 21957
            • 505
            • 235
            • 32,983

            #35
            Originally posted by BennyST
            I thought you were talking about Blow, not Jones. My bad.
            No problem.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP