A "W" for Roy Jones Jr. is Great, where a "W" for Joe Calzaghe is good...but neither man is facing a major loss in my opinion.
Lets put things in perspective...
Roy Jones Jr. is 39 years old....FACT.
Most great fighters at 39 are a shell of their former selves or retired...FACT. Check what Leonard was doing in his late 30's-40's.
Roy Jones Jr. is expected to lose by most boxing fans and insiders....FACT.
Roy Jones Jr.'s best days are probably anywhere from 7-10 years ago....OPINION/but i think many would agree thats also a fact.
__________________________________________________ ________________
Joe Calzaghe, while he is past his physical prime(36), is one the best fighters in the world.....FACT (in fact, I think hes probably #2 p4p.
Joe Calzaghe is expected to win...FACT. 4-1 favorite
Joe Calzaghe is undefeated and has had some of his best wins recently...FACT.
__________________________________________________ ________________
Does Calzaghe deserve credit for beating Roy Jones Jr., absolutely. Why? Roy is still a pretty damn good fighter even at nearly 40 years old. But in the same way Lennox Lewis can't say he beat the best Mike Tyson, Joe Calzaghe/nor his fans should claim he beat the best Roy Jones Jr. Why? Its simply not true.
Now if Roy beats Joe Calzaghe, one could also make the argument that Roy didn't beat the best Joe Calzaghe. Due to the fact that Joe Calzaghe is 36 years old, it is reasonable to say hes is also not in his prime. I agree, but a win for Jones(for obvious reasons), is still bigger than a win for Calzaghe. A loss for Joe, I would argue is not bad for Joe. Joe could say that Roy is one of the best ever and he managed to turn back the clock. A loss for Roy, he could simply say Joe at this stage was just too much for him to handle. So really there is no major loser on the 8th, there can only be a winner.
If Joe beats Roy. Good for him. If Roy beats Joe, great for him only because he is such an underdog. The point is, whoever loses, should not have their legacy damaged too badly at all. And that while a win for Joe is good, a win for Roy is great due to each fighters being a different places in their careers. But when either fighter loses, neither should take a big legacy hit.
Lets put things in perspective...
Roy Jones Jr. is 39 years old....FACT.
Most great fighters at 39 are a shell of their former selves or retired...FACT. Check what Leonard was doing in his late 30's-40's.
Roy Jones Jr. is expected to lose by most boxing fans and insiders....FACT.
Roy Jones Jr.'s best days are probably anywhere from 7-10 years ago....OPINION/but i think many would agree thats also a fact.
__________________________________________________ ________________
Joe Calzaghe, while he is past his physical prime(36), is one the best fighters in the world.....FACT (in fact, I think hes probably #2 p4p.
Joe Calzaghe is expected to win...FACT. 4-1 favorite
Joe Calzaghe is undefeated and has had some of his best wins recently...FACT.
__________________________________________________ ________________
Does Calzaghe deserve credit for beating Roy Jones Jr., absolutely. Why? Roy is still a pretty damn good fighter even at nearly 40 years old. But in the same way Lennox Lewis can't say he beat the best Mike Tyson, Joe Calzaghe/nor his fans should claim he beat the best Roy Jones Jr. Why? Its simply not true.
Now if Roy beats Joe Calzaghe, one could also make the argument that Roy didn't beat the best Joe Calzaghe. Due to the fact that Joe Calzaghe is 36 years old, it is reasonable to say hes is also not in his prime. I agree, but a win for Jones(for obvious reasons), is still bigger than a win for Calzaghe. A loss for Joe, I would argue is not bad for Joe. Joe could say that Roy is one of the best ever and he managed to turn back the clock. A loss for Roy, he could simply say Joe at this stage was just too much for him to handle. So really there is no major loser on the 8th, there can only be a winner.
If Joe beats Roy. Good for him. If Roy beats Joe, great for him only because he is such an underdog. The point is, whoever loses, should not have their legacy damaged too badly at all. And that while a win for Joe is good, a win for Roy is great due to each fighters being a different places in their careers. But when either fighter loses, neither should take a big legacy hit.
Comment