Revise Boxing NOW to make it more exciting: what would you do?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • THE REED
    Sixty Forty
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 43489
    • 1,992
    • 1,483
    • 690,068,075

    #21
    replace gloves with shardes of glass.... van damne style.

    Comment

    • Pullcounter
      no guts no glory
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2004
      • 42582
      • 549
      • 191
      • 49,739

      #22
      Originally posted by LoloChivas
      true..maybe both can agree on the contract and both put some money aside and if one wins by ko that one takes the bonus and if its a dicision they get their money back...
      i don't think any boxer would sign something that takes away from their purse. i don't remember any boxers ever fighting a winner-take-all or winner-take-the-pot type fights (which is what your idea of a KO-bonus is). the only way the KO bonus will work is if someone on high other than the fighters puts up the money.

      Comment

      • juancho
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Jul 2006
        • 479
        • 7
        • 6
        • 6,782

        #23
        make the sanctioning bodies two huge ones and lessen the drama,i think getting rid of 108 or 105 would be good too.but 168 is goo,hughe difference from 160 to 175

        Comment

        • Equilibrium
          Knuckles Up
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2006
          • 3048
          • 421
          • 563
          • 10,411

          #24
          1 - Less belts, 1 belt, 1 champion by weight class. That way we would see the best fights possible, no more holding on 1 belt and ducking the other champions.

          2-More free boxing on tv, contracts with big tv channels could eventually replace pay per view.

          Thats what i could think about that hasnt been said, it would help without changing the sport.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP